hono4kami@slrpnk.netM to Public Transport@slrpnk.netEnglish · 5 days agoSometimes it feels like folks in US would build anything but efficient transit 🤦slrpnk.netimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1135arrow-down111
arrow-up1124arrow-down1imageSometimes it feels like folks in US would build anything but efficient transit 🤦slrpnk.nethono4kami@slrpnk.netM to Public Transport@slrpnk.netEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareNorah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-25 days agoShort-distance city trains used to have multiple compartments too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_Door_(train) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_(train)
minus-square🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 days agoThings like the “C-Trains” in Calgary, despite being intended for mass transit (and ridden mainly by the poors) are also multi-compartment.
minus-squarehono4kami@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoI assumed the parent commenter meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartment_coach But if the commenter meant cross-seat trains like this: then yeah it exists
minus-squareNorah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoYes… it’s the first one? Did you not look at the links I shared?
Short-distance city trains used to have multiple compartments too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_Door_(train) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_(train)
Things like the “C-Trains” in Calgary, despite being intended for mass transit (and ridden mainly by the poors) are also multi-compartment.
I assumed the parent commenter meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartment_coach
But if the commenter meant cross-seat trains like this:
then yeah it exists
Yes… it’s the first one? Did you not look at the links I shared?