David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 4 days ago"Sam Altman is one of the dullest, most incurious and least creative people to walk this earth."deadsimpletech.comexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down10
arrow-up1220arrow-down1external-link"Sam Altman is one of the dullest, most incurious and least creative people to walk this earth."deadsimpletech.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·4 days agoit may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find things out from them I know it requires speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down10·4 days agoIt may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find out what they think, not what is true. I know proof requires more than just speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie.
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 days agodid you know the report also publishes the details of its analysis methodology? my god, where are you people coming from today
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down8·edit-24 days agoDid you know that all reputable surveys publish their methodology? Did you know that, regardless of how you analyze the results, a survey is still just a survey? If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility, not just sentiment.
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·4 days agoThis is a pretty funny interaction when you realise that you just misread the froztbyte’s self-reply (and the survey) as pro-AI, so you were just aggressively agreeing with each other all along
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-24 days ago(why I was not as harsh as in earlier comments)
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 days ago If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility you think I’m promptfan-posting? impressive.
it may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find things out from them
I know it requires speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie
It may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find out what they think, not what is true.
I know proof requires more than just speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie.
did you know the report also publishes the details of its analysis methodology?
my god, where are you people coming from today
Did you know that all reputable surveys publish their methodology?
Did you know that, regardless of how you analyze the results, a survey is still just a survey?
If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility, not just sentiment.
This is a pretty funny interaction when you realise that you just misread the froztbyte’s self-reply (and the survey) as pro-AI, so you were just aggressively agreeing with each other all along
(why I was not as harsh as in earlier comments)
you think I’m promptfan-posting? impressive.