WFM models are more efficient, so forcing people back to the office is less efficient. He has no proof people aren’t doing their jobs, and the proof there is is against him. He is doing spiteful boomer shit, or is stupid, or is trying to legally dump as many workers as he can to replace them with those who will express fealty to him, maybe all three.
I pay their paychecks with my taxes. I want them in the office. I’m glad he’s doing this. If they are as skilled as they think they are, then they shouldn’t have any problems getting a better job that will allow them to work from home. Right?
I don’t think working in the office is more wasteful. YOU think that, but I don’t. And since the majority of fed workers don’t work from home (your point), this won’t make much difference.
The great thing about America is if we don’t like working somewhere, we can always go somewhere else.
If working from home is sooooo efficient like you say, then there will be plenty of companies that offer that option, so these fed workers can quit and join those super-efficient work-from-home companies.
Be sure to contact them on their LinkedIn sites and offer them information about your company. Maybe they can become your super efficient co-workers.
I don’t just think that. There is a lot of data backing that up, and yes, for every company forcing back to office, there is another capitalizing on their loss of talent.
This is the government, this is about efficiency, and what can be demonstrated with evidence, not how you feel about something.
You keep coming at this from the angle I am mad people lose their jobs. I am not, they will very likely find work without a huge issue. The problem is the government, that I pay taxes to, is using uselessly less efficient methods of operation, out of a combination of spite, and the desire to meet the project 2025 quota of turning people over to those who will kiss the ring.
You are like a con-man who thinks everyone else is also a fraud because you can’t imagine people thinking drastically different than you, about the same things. That and the crabs in a pot mentality of “you can’t have it better than I did! if things get better, that’s not fair to me! now get back down here and suffer with me.”
FWIW He has discussed before how he personally abused WFH before retiring. Also that the efficiency stuff is immaterial compared to having the workforce suffer in the office trenches as he did.
That is fine, I can still question their stance until it comes down to just admitting there is a bad reason, or, at least, and very poorly reasoned one.
WFM models are more efficient, so forcing people back to the office is less efficient. He has no proof people aren’t doing their jobs, and the proof there is is against him. He is doing spiteful boomer shit, or is stupid, or is trying to legally dump as many workers as he can to replace them with those who will express fealty to him, maybe all three.
I pay their paychecks with my taxes. I want them in the office. I’m glad he’s doing this. If they are as skilled as they think they are, then they shouldn’t have any problems getting a better job that will allow them to work from home. Right?
Dankon, amiko!
So you want to pay for a less efficient system? Like, intentionally?
I pay their paychecks with my taxes. I want them in the office. I’m glad he’s doing this.
Let me be more clear: I am VERY HAPPY HE IS DOING THIS.
Cool?
Dankon, amiko!
You are VERY HAPPY they are moving back to a more wasteful model?
I don’t think working in the office is more wasteful. YOU think that, but I don’t. And since the majority of fed workers don’t work from home (your point), this won’t make much difference.
The great thing about America is if we don’t like working somewhere, we can always go somewhere else.
If working from home is sooooo efficient like you say, then there will be plenty of companies that offer that option, so these fed workers can quit and join those super-efficient work-from-home companies.
Be sure to contact them on their LinkedIn sites and offer them information about your company. Maybe they can become your super efficient co-workers.
Dankon, amiko!
I don’t just think that. There is a lot of data backing that up, and yes, for every company forcing back to office, there is another capitalizing on their loss of talent.
This is the government, this is about efficiency, and what can be demonstrated with evidence, not how you feel about something.
So if there’s so much data backing that up, then more places would be allowing work from home.
So should be plenty of jobs out there for people who are unhappy about their federal job no longer letting them from home.
So no problem! They can just get a new job at all those workplaces that are following all that exciting data!
Lucky, right?
And now people who want to work from home, know that getting a federal job may no longer align with their goals
So happy people all around.
Dankon, amiko!!
You keep coming at this from the angle I am mad people lose their jobs. I am not, they will very likely find work without a huge issue. The problem is the government, that I pay taxes to, is using uselessly less efficient methods of operation, out of a combination of spite, and the desire to meet the project 2025 quota of turning people over to those who will kiss the ring.
You are like a con-man who thinks everyone else is also a fraud because you can’t imagine people thinking drastically different than you, about the same things. That and the crabs in a pot mentality of “you can’t have it better than I did! if things get better, that’s not fair to me! now get back down here and suffer with me.”
FWIW He has discussed before how he personally abused WFH before retiring. Also that the efficiency stuff is immaterial compared to having the workforce suffer in the office trenches as he did.
That is fine, I can still question their stance until it comes down to just admitting there is a bad reason, or, at least, and very poorly reasoned one.