• sanpo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just a marketing stunt.

    Literally the first lines in the article mentions he ditched Spotify in favor of some bullshit “blockchain-powered competitor Tune.fm”, whatever the fuck that means.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        …which I could tolerate, because he didn’t seem to be taking himself seriously, but performing at Trump’s inauguration was just WAY too much.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          In a way I can understand it. Somebody else would have if not for he. But I couldn’t say that I would do the same.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Calling something “blockchain-powered” is a great way to demonstrate that you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • assembly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As an artist on the streaming platforms, I don’t just distribute music to one, it gets sent out to all. I put the most effort into growing my Apple and Amazon music streams as they actually pay. Spotify gives me by far the most streams but they don’t pay shit so I just don’t put much effort into that. YouTube seems to pay pretty well for music streaming, even got some royalties from TikTok even though I didn’t realize I was on there. I heard Tidal and Deezer pay well but I don’t have listeners there so not much I can do with that.

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Tidal and Deezer pay well but I don’t have listeners there so not much I can do with that.

        As a listener who occasionally uses tidal it seems like it is more likely to play more well known artists as opposed to Spotify which seems to tend towards almost royalty free soundalike stuff if you take your finger off the skip button momentarily.

        So from that I would assume it’s a lot harder to gain an audience on tidal and thats probably part of why they pay better, as the subscription pie is being split up into fewer pieces. Also maybe tidal are still manipulating thier streaming traffic count data in favour of investors like they have in the past.

      • pezhore@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ll give you an actual answer as opposed to just going with another exploitative megacorp.

        Buy their shit on Bandcamp or wherever full albums are sold. Use Plex or jellyfin to stream to your phone.

      • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve tried them all at some point from a hifi perspective. To me tidal is the one I keep going back to as the quality is great, music selection is superb, and discovery is good. I slightly prefer qobuz sound quality, but their new music discovery algorithms are sadly subpar. If you don’t care about finding new music outside the mainstream, buying directly from artists website is still best.

      • AshMan85@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        i have been using youtube music. i already had a google account and it is technically youtube which is one of the biggest payers. would like to find one that isn’t owned by one of the 5 companies that own everything lol