cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square493fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down114cross-posted to: technik@feddit.orgartificialintelligence@lemmy.sdf.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 天前message-square493fedilinkcross-posted to: technik@feddit.orgartificialintelligence@lemmy.sdf.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-22 天前Why? Nothing they’ve shat out is good for anything anyway.
minus-squareazalty@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 天前If not, AI is dead in the US Technically, everything you write is copyrighted
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 天前There are works that are free to use. They could also compensate copyright holders for their work. As they should since they are profiting from it.
minus-squareazalty@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前I’m all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前Then I guess they can’t use it… Unless the owner wants to cut them some kind of deal.
minus-squareazalty@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 小时前We’ll see how it turns out, but yea they’re in big trouble
minus-squaremadjo@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 天前Oh no, how horrible… AI is dead in the US? How shall we live? /sarcasm
minus-squaret0m4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 天前I’m not an american but losing in that area internationally might be way worse than to fight over training data. Maybe not paying the full amount of the copyright, but I agree they should compensate the IP holders.
minus-squaremadjo@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前I don’t believe there’s a future in AI at all.
minus-squaret0m4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 小时前Why though? For me it’s already very useful. You can also see what boston dynamic does thats also very helpful in general. Don’t be so ignorant.
minus-squaredesertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 天前You don’t need to say anything else, I’m already happy with that outcome
Why? Nothing they’ve shat out is good for anything anyway.
If not, AI is dead in the US
Technically, everything you write is copyrighted
There are works that are free to use. They could also compensate copyright holders for their work. As they should since they are profiting from it.
I’m all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work
Then I guess they can’t use it… Unless the owner wants to cut them some kind of deal.
We’ll see how it turns out, but yea they’re in big trouble
Oh no, how horrible… AI is dead in the US? How shall we live? /sarcasm
I’m not an american but losing in that area internationally might be way worse than to fight over training data.
Maybe not paying the full amount of the copyright, but I agree they should compensate the IP holders.
I don’t believe there’s a future in AI at all.
Why though? For me it’s already very useful. You can also see what boston dynamic does thats also very helpful in general.
Don’t be so ignorant.
You don’t need to say anything else, I’m already happy with that outcome