cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down111
arrow-up1468arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 days ago until it’s better we should simply ignore this That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoMany people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoWith quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoThe idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
Many people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
I don’t think so, but yes.
The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.