• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    And that’s different than what any other US president would have done? Kowtowing to Israel is US government policy.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      that changes nothing….
      and Isreal has been acting much worse than they were before… although it was still genocidal

    • lapping6596@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nothing different. I’d argue that’s another indicator that the US’s ‘health’ has been bad for a long time.

    • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      The point is whether the 25th amendment should have been invoked.

      If the conditions were met, then other past presidents doing the same thing just means the 25th amendment should have been invoked in those situations as well.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        None of this has anything to do with the 25th Amendment. The 25th is the process for removing a president from office in the event of physical or mental disability to severe that the President can no longer carry out the duties of office.

        Committing war crimes doesn’t trigger the 25th. Neither does breaking any other law. Those are what impeachment is for, and (ignoring the Supreme Court’s recent unlawful establishment of an elective absolute monarchy) enforcement of the law against the President, in those cases where there are criminal penalties.