I have a Synology that needs more storage. Thoughts on WD vs Seagate?
I’ve always bought WD Red, but with the recent WD controversies (including the SMR/CMR scandal and the recent WDDA warning), I’m considering Seagate. Also, I can’t find any difference between the IronWolf Pro and Exos drives. What am I missing?
| Metric | Seagate IronWolf Pro 20TB | Seagate Exos X20 20TB | WD Red Pro 20TB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spindle speed (RPM) | 7200 | 7200 | 7200 |
| Internal transfer rate | 285 MB/s | 272 MB/s | 268 MB/s |
| Gas | Helium | Helium | ??? |
| Cache | 256MB | 256MB | 512MB |
| CMR? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| MTBF (hours) | 2.5m | 2.5m | 2.5m |
| Non-recoverable errors per bits read | 1 in 10^15 | 1 in 10^15 | 1 in 10^15 |
| Load unload cycles | 600k | 600k | 600k |
| Workload rate (TB/yr) | 550 | 550 | 550 |
| Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) | 0.35% | 0.35% | ??? |
| Warranty | 5yr | 5yr | 5yr |
| Price | $349.99 | $329.99 | $379.99 |
Also, please don’t recommend shucking (those drives are in external enclosures because they didn’t pass QC to become internal HDDs).
Go for a mix. Buy them from different providers too if possible.
I bought 4 used 16TB ironwolfs for a really good price. They only had a year of on time. I have used them for 2 years now and no issues. I also haven’t had any issued with any of the WD, Toshiba or Hitachi drives I own–and my Hitachi is 15 years old.
I’ve personally just bought what is cheaper $/Gb if they’re broadly equal then features & power, if still locked I have tended towards WD. But I’m not storing anything critical and if a drive failed, I’d be annoyed but that’s about it.
Toshiba n300
Can’t help with these 3 specifically. I ordered som wd gokd drives. Which are the ones intended for datacenters. Price was lower. And I think it was 10^16 not 10^15. That may not sound like alot. But doing the math, number of bits on a raid6 of 8 14tb drives, basically going to hit 10^15. And they supposedly have firmware to handle vibration. Maybe worth looking into.
As for these 3, I would think they would all be fine choices.
I always run WD. None of my drives have failed in regular use. Been using WD in my NAS for two years now without issues.
Seagate has permanently lost my business since their 50% failure rates from many years ago. It’s well documented if you search for it. Never again. Lost multiple arrays because of this.
Seagate for internal drives, WD for external.
You seem to be in the minority in regards to seagate, any particular reason you prefer them for internal drives?
seems like seagate has higher failures, WD has terrible a terrible warranty department. pick your poison
IronWolf Pro
I have 20+ of them, none have failed.
I also have 50+ Exos, none have failed.Had a lot of wd fail over the years. Since upgrading to Seagate exos only. Haven’t had any failures. Maybe due to the fact they are enterprise drives. Not sure. But very happy with Seagate exos
I was collecting dead hard drives for the magnets and shit, very few WD drives. Most drives were Seagate. I will never personally buy one again.
QC in only external defects like a stripped mounting hole. Drives themselves are still hend to same standards.
WD. I’ve had more Seagates fail on me, but take a look at backblazes’s data. They go through a ton of drives.
The reason that companies pay a lot of money for more reliable drives isn’t uptime or loss-prevention. There are better ways to solve that. The reason is because it’s super expensive to have a guy go pull the drive. That’s not a cost the homelabber has to pay. Buy retail drives, put them in a sensible configuration, and be on your merry way.