No more open source.

Vendors who provide competitive services built on our community products will no longer be able to incorporate future releases, bug fixes, or security patches contributed to our products.

    • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not affected today, many businesses were started from home. We already know it’s not possible any more to build a business using hashicorp products as they could pivot at any moment and then you’d be “competing” and in breach of license.

      • vojel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes but is that affecting you businesswise, for example using terraform for proviosioning infrastructure for a customer? As far as I understand this move it affects companies like gruntwork who makes a business on top of terraform with terragrunt. Dont get me wrong, I do dislike this change also but saying „it is not open source anymore“ is just wrong. It is still open source but its usage changed for companies making a dollar here or there with technologies they dont develop.

        • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is still open source but its usage changed for companies making a dollar here or there with technologies they dont develop

          That’s not open source.

    • ck_@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is a rather short sighted interpretation of what is happening I feel. Essentially the company is moving from FLOSS to “free as in beer”, which will very likely affect the product in the long run.

      • julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not quite, it‘s only restricting competitors and so all companies and home labbers can still use it for free and contribute as in free speech.

        However this can bring a lot more financial sustainability to a project. I don‘t know the specifics, but the main problem is that companies make profit of the software, but don’t invest enough money back into the product. This cannot be good for users. Open source must be financially stable.

        Also right now all those competitors (and users) can create a fork and maintain it. So it is up to the community what will happen to the project.

    • g5pw@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but it’s a question of principle. I try to use and support FLOSS software if possible.