• neoman4426@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the "how to"s were swapped it’d still be pretty “don’t dead”, but at least vaguely sensible. No idea what the fuck they were going for with that swap

    • XIN@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It's still not fantastic, but it is better.

      It’s still not fantastic, but it is better.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s worse; it’s plain and boring. Nothing about it attracts attention. The seemingly incongruous first version draws your attention.

        • Why9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It often doesn’t have to be fancy. Boring is good. It’s tried and tested to work.

          Sometimes it’s about getting the message across as coherently and quickly as possible.

          Modern day humans have very low attention spans (think about the frustration you get after a website hasn’t loaded after 5 seconds!). If I have to try and figure out something and it takes me longer than a second to do so, I’m gone.

          But if it’s an ad for an agency that provides a service I’m looking for, and they have a banner that looks simple and clear like this, I’m liable to notice and give them a call.

        • XIN@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean legibility, but I agree. We wouldn’t even be having this conversation had it been aligned like my image.