- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
- hardware@lemmy.ml
- games@sh.itjust.works
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
- hardware@lemmy.ml
- games@sh.itjust.works
New OLED screen. New APU. And lots of small hardware improvements.
New OLED screen. New APU. And lots of small hardware improvements.
The benefit of the 90hz is that it raises the bar for refresh rate/2 gameplay for latency/performamce requirement.
40hz alone is half of the input latency difference between 30 and 60 fps, and is much more realistic to hit performance numbers for. Some people run it at 40hz for optimized battery/performamce/latency ratio. Setting it to 45 now makes it every frame is evenly doubled. That along with the die shrink/10W/Hr/chemistry changes will allow the battery to last a lot longer on the go, at least on paper
That would make more sense if you couldn’t set the old LCD panel to 45 already. There’s still an advantage to doubling each frame, especially in reducing latency on frame drops, but I don’t think there are any refresh targets under 60 the old panel couldn’t match after they introduced the manual refresh control feature.
The battery life seems much, much better, though. There are already some preview benchmarks that say at minimum TDP you can get to double digit hours on this thing. That’s nuts for a x64 handheld device.