The language used is not going to harm people. The intent is, which was my point.
Read -> Parse the meaning -> React accordingly. Is a correct way to communicate.
Read -> React to trigger word -> Disregard meaning Is not. It’s just conditioned response.
If you do not think disagreement is a productive contribution, maybe you’re not looking for a discussion.
You should stop focusing on vocabulary and get your mind on intent, this is getting stupid.
the fuck is a political scientist
nobody here gives a shit if anything is newsworthy. Or true. Or propaganda. This place is a shit show.
I mean what did you expect, you came to their place and insulted them.
It’s not just a theory. Anyone who’ve seen internet before 2015 knows the difference.
An unforeseeable and unfortunate side effect of humans interacting daily with bots masquerading as humans is that we mimic them.
And that we lose our ability to see humanity in others. Being flooded with machines who cannot understand or be touched, influenced, which whom we cannot empathize changed the way we see our fellow humans.
I don’t think there’s any coming back from that. Hopefully there’s a way forward, now that AI’s aren’t a big secret anymore.
Creating a positive mental landscape, based on action, something to strive for, rather than visions of impeding doom., is an essential first step.