Not even close. Make them start with 60k in debt, they need to pay 6k back every turn, and there is 5% interest on the debt. The debt is paid first and cannot be removed with bankruptcy Also, after 10 turns, if they own no properties, but have made the minimum payment each time, there is a 3% chance that the debt is forgiven. At the end of 20 turns, if they have made all the minimum payments, and they own no properties, flip 9 coins. If all of them are heads, then the debt is forgiven.

I’m cool with it, as long as the next President makes trump’s photos his mugshot, and signed naked woman letter to Epstein.

Eh. Trump is so narcissistic, I could not see him doing anything that would bring pleasure to another person.

Honestly, this works more often than not.

Most modern printers won’t let you print or copy money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation

Fun things you learn working in a print shop.

It’s less “hate the poor” and more “being good dogs for their wealthy masters”

No. The resultant object will just reach equilibrium on one of it’s sides.

Yes, aslong as the gaggle of goons you bring with you don’t fuck it up.

Spoiler : They were pro-pedophile long before 2016.

I’d rather LOSE ALL MY EVERYONE’S HEALTHCARE AND FOOD then than to Allow Trump to be found GUILTY of RAPING LITTLE CHILDREN!

Fixed it for you.

Oh yeah. If you’ve got 4 GB ram, win 11 is going to absolutely skullfuck that machine.

Tell me you’ve never had a nail in a tire without telling me you’ve never had a nail in a tire.

Do you not feel the irony of calling that out when the winner of both of those elections was trump?

To use a phrase… If I had a nickel for every time we’ve elected orange Hitler, I’d have two nickles, but it’s weird that it happened twice.

Ok bud, you are just being pedantic now… I have explained it 1000x times…

Being pedantic matters here, because you are countering a position I didn’t make. If you don’t want me to be pedantic about it, then either show I made the argument (by quoting it) or drop the argument.

Correct, to highlight that you are asking people to compromise with the Democrats when the Democrats would not compromise with the people.

Pretry sure Democrats did compromise with the people who voted in their primary. That’s the whole point of having a primary…

So go vote for who you want in the primaries, and vote against who you don’t want in the general.

Alright. Please highlight in that statement where I said that the US was a perfectly functional and not systemically broken democracy?

Again I repeat (as many others while you keep on ignoring them in this thread), the problem here is that you keep on painting a picture where people have a say which is not the case.

Funny that you wrote this… And in the very next paragraph mentioned Mamdani winning despite the opposition from political insiders.

I don’t think you are in a position to judge the fairness of an election process, as you seem convinced that Bernie should have been the DNC nominee despite losing by 3 million votes in the primary ( and again, that is votes not delegates) And yes, I’m going to call you out on that until you walk it back.

You offered a solution based on a working democracy which is not the case here… why do you offer one if you know it won’t work?

Please provide specifics, otherwise you are just talking around what I actually wrote.

I did read your link. Do two things for me here. First, look up how many votes (not delegates but votes) Bernie and Hillary got in the primary. Second, please recognize that I am talking about direct votes for a candidate, not the delegates. Let me know if you think a working democracy is one where the less popular candidate gets the nomination.

I’m sorry

No you aren’t, don’t lie.

…not recognizing the flavour of democracy the USA has is broken is a problem.

I never claimed that democracy in the US wasn’t broken. If you think I did, please point specific statements.

Here you go…

How many votes did Bernie get in the primary, and how many did Hillary get? I can understand being upset about the results of the primary if Bernie had received more votes than Hillary, and then the DNC nominated Hillary anyway, but that didn’t happen. He lost the primary, and thus he was not the candidate. He knows that democracy is a compromisea, and he not just voted for, but publicly supported and campaigned for Hillary after he lost the nomination.

Okay. I meant to imply that any democracy (practically by definition) is based on compromise, which is why I said that straight up instead of snarkily (and unhelpfully) bashing the USA.

As for the Hillary-Bernie thing… At then end of the primary, Hillary had like 3 million more votes than Bernie did. Notably, Bernie conceeded to Hillary and even campaigned for her, because he knew that she was much better than trump, and democracy is inherently a compromise.

Any/every democracy?

I know what compromise looks like and I reward it when I see it.

… I will not keep falling in line for candidates that would rather lose than listen to me…

I rest my case.