Coca_Cola_but_Commie [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2020

help-circle

  • I watch a bit of Dropout and on one of their shows there was a bit where they had a celebrity judge and they were doing a survivor parody, I think. Can’t remember who the celebrity was, I guess it doesn’t matter. But Adam Conover was there, sort of randomly because he’d never been in an episode of that particular show before, and I remember thinking it was clear that he was only there because he was friends with the boss and must have wanted a chance to be around the celebrity guest. He just stuck out like a sore thumb because this was one of their improv shows which are entirely built around the actors’ rapport with one another, a sizable part of the appeal is that you can tell all the performers and crew are friends who are hanging out, and none of the other performers seemed to know what to do with or say to Adam. I didn’t necessarily feel like the other performers disliked Adam or anything, it was just very much the “friend of a friend who you don’t know or have anything in common with has come to the get-together and it’s making things slightly awkward” vibe.

    Also he just wasn’t very funny.


  • I actually kinda like Rogue One but the main thing I remember about the movie is that when they properly introduce the blind monk character, Chirrut Îmwe, it’s in the middle of a fight and he shows up to knock out stormtroopers with his walking stick. And at first it’s sort of cool, but then it goes on forever, and it starts to feel silly, and you can feel the cracks in the choreography because you start to think “surely one of these guys would just shoot him in the back” and then the character is just there and basically doesn’t do or say anything of significance until his death scene. Sort of the problem of the entire movie in microcosm. Lots of interesting ideas for characters that don’t get much to do or say. Even the best fleshed out character, Jyn, feels contradictory and ultimately thinly characterized.

    As I always say, the novelization is much better.


  • Hey I don’t know how aware you are of this but they just put out a biopic about your life, mostly about you joining the rebellion. It was pretty good, they got Diego Luna to play you and everything. Maybe a little prettier than the real thing, eh? Anyway, while watching I kept waiting for you to directly address the audience and specify that you are the exact same type of communist that I am, but you never did. Why was that cut from the film, do you think?



  • I love AOTC, on paper. A hard-boiled detective story; Star-crossed lovers; A political thriller; All set across the epic backdrop of space in an age where a once great government is coming to its end. What’s not to love?

    In practice though if ROTS is a screw-up child, and TPM is like a kid who you thought was going to be president but then ended up as a working mid-tier stand-up comic like just enough to make a living but not enough to “make it”, then AOTC is a kid who grew up to be a serial killer.

    Also I’m pretty sure the novelization is by R.A. Salvatore. I’ve not read it but I have read some of his other novels and the man’s not a miracle worker like Stover.

    I love the version of AOTC that lives in my head, but every seven years or so when I convince myself to do a rewatch I find I just can’t enjoy it. Some really great ideas, but the execution of them is something else. I really think that with the right script doctor, some judicious editing, and maybe a second director who is just in charge of the actors, it could have been something really great. But what we’re left with is tough to love. But I respect you for doing what I can not.


  • Clearly it’s too late now, but I think the answer is to just jump into watching A New Hope.

    click here to read my proselytizing about the Rogue One novelization, which I do every time the film is mentioned

    I think the best way to experience Rogue One is to listen to the audiobook. The book papers over the worst parts of the movie and adds some much-needed dimensions to Jyn Erso, and I really like the audiobook narrator they got for it. But then I am biased because of course I saw the movie first. I had already experienced the performances. Do Saw Guerra and Orson Krennic really work on the page if you’ve never seen Forrest Whittaker and Ben Mendelsohn’s performances? I’ll never know. Then again we get some of Galen(Jyn’s father, the scientist)'s POV and I think the character is much stronger in the book than the film, ditto for nearly all the characters but Galen and Jyn especially, so maybe it all balances out.


  • Also I can’t believe we learn some of Luthen’s backstory. I just assumed he was someone a bit like Mon Mothma, using his real name and the real identity he had during the time of the Republic as an antiquities dealer as a cover for his rebel activities. Much more interesting to learn that he was an NCO with a penchant for artifacts who got fed up one day and made a choice of where to stand, just like the people he recruits. Interesting that it seems no one, not even Kleya, will ever know Luthen’s real name or who he really was before he rebelled.


  • Incredible that Tony Gilroy came along and just made the best thing Star Wars has put out since 1980. Why would he do that?

    My personal enjoyment of the operatic tragedy that is Revenge of the Sith might edge out Andor, slightly, but loving ROTS is what I imagine it must feel like to have a kid who’s a real screw-up. You love them and you see all the best parts of them, but you can’t deny the mistakes they’ve made. But unlike ROTS I don’t needs to qualify my enjoyment of Andor. It’s not like twenty years from now I’m going to say “oh I like Andor but have you read the novelization? It completely realizes what that show was trying to do,” like I do now with both ROTS and Rogue One.

    I think next paycheck I’m going to splurge and buy a lot of the old X-wing novel series if I can find one that’s not too high.


  • What an incredible face Genevieve O’Reilly pulled there, and what a good show. Can’t believe the spin-off streaming TV show for the only serviceable Star Wars movie Disney put out has becoming one of my GOATs.

    Thinking about buying a lot of all the de-canonized X-wing novels just to get a fix. Even considering buying Alexander Freed’s sequel-era trilogy (Alphabet Squadron) because he wrote a good book about rebel grunts in the age of the empire (Twilight Company, which is actually a spin-off of the terrible fucking battlefront game Disney put out) and he also did the novelization for Rogue One, which I thought was quite good, better than the film. But my disdain for the sequel era stops me, for now.





  • Disney must really be paying for a marketing blitz for their new marvel movie, because my twitter timeline is full of it.

    I don’t watch marvel movies, I don’t much like them, I don’t interact with posts about them. If I do, it’s usually accounts I follow making fun of whatever the latest Marvel slop is. The recent Captain America movie they did, Deadpool & Wolverine, Doctor Strange, etc. I really only see posts mocking these films. When a marvel movie is (comparatively) well-received I really don’t see much about it. I heard the latest Guardians of the Galaxy movie was well liked, I didn’t see a single post about that film. The last time I can remember there being serious activity on my TL is either when everyone was making fun of the Scarlet Witch show or when everyone was making fun of Eternals.

    But this new Thunderbolts movie, I swear every other post is about it. Not from accounts I follow, either. Not making fun of the movie, but excitedly buying into its marketing gimmicks. Every post is Taskermaster this, New Avengers that, Florence Pugh is slayying in this one queen. I hate it. I’m not interacting with this posts, I demand they go away.

    One more sign I should stop using social media, but do I ever learn?






  • I’m listening to the audiobook for Fairy Tale by Stephen King. It’s not bad so far, but it has been funny because it’s from the POV of a 16 year old boy in 2013, but it’s fairly clear it’s written by the then ~75 year old King. The only references to pop culture so far have been Cujo, the original Psycho, and a nonspecific mention that the main character’s favorite music is classic rock/heavy metal.

    The Cujo reference was pretty astounding because a character references it offhand as a pop culture totem, a thing everyone knows. It didn’t feel like a sly wink-wink-nod-nod “I wrote that” from King, it was totally natural.

    And while it’s not impossible that a 17 year old in 2013 could have seen the 1960 film Psycho, it still definitely feels like a very old man writing about his own youth, or maybe the times when his now-middle-aged sons were young. For the first ten minutes or so I just assumed this story was set in the late '50s like the first half of IT. It wasn’t until the narrator mentioned Amazon that I realized it was supposed to be more current.

    I’m sure plenty of 17 year olds in 2013 happened to share Stephen King’s love of baseball, but there’s been no reference to YouTube, or whatever TV was popular among teens that year, or celebrities, or video games. At the very least this guy should have an opinion of Justin Bieber. There’s no way the only things a 17 year old in 2013 likes are Psycho, baseball, and classic rock.