.
While I rather use more secure apps for following public channels, sadly they don’t exist on other platforms.
Because I want to view and share only content that respect my freedom of use.
Because the article is licensed under free license (Creative Commons).
As long as the source prove to have enough credibility, I would always link to the freely licensed version over less freely licensed sources.
I believe not, the foss release will make the app run in the background to check for notifications.
Slashdot is closed source, use SoylentNews instead.
If I ever produce a creative work I will release it into public domain.
A lot of authors and artists choose to release their work to the public domain voluntarily.
I just want to say:
Fuck Copyright
deleted by creator
I am confused, that is exactly what the title is saying, right?
Edit: I believe that is 1.4M pills containing 153 Kgs of fentanyl.
I guess you are a troll, I already explained to you why they mention his nationality and that the number of pills is high in general, if you consider it insignificant, then that is only your opinion here.
The end of the fiscal year 2024 is 30/Sep and the start was in 1/Oct 2023 .
Here is a article explaining it: Why the beginning of fiscal year 2024 is in October, not January.
Sigh, good job spitting links instead of facts.
I don’t get what you are trying to communicate.
1.4 million pills is nothing.
If that’s nothing for you than that’s only your opinion.
But sure, let’s highlight that it was a Mexican national.
All the department of justice press releases follow the same format in relation to nationalities, if you read in the website you will find them mentioning even the state of which the person is from if he is American.
But unless we are talking about very few non-profit news organizations, you have to choose one of them.
The question assumes that you will have to experience whatever you choose, so without ad blocking, what would you choose?
I mean having a list of allowed clients.
As I said in my post, WhatsApp already enforce forbidding third party client and it seems to work well.
I don’t see why wouldn’t Signal improve the security of their users by implementing this, while upsetting the very few users who use third party clients.