Why should taxpayers subsidize someone’s dumb decision to buy a Florida beach house?

California: “First time?”

https://theintercept.com/2021/05/07/california-fires-chico-housing-real-estate/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/20/justice-department-antitrust-case-google-430281

Republicans have a 2024 platform. You can Google it.

Idiocracy

While I know things are generally more expensive in Switzerland, $685,000 is crazy expensive for just 18 kW (48 panels).

This type of collision involving a sober driver and drunk pedestrian is included in the tally of alcohol-related traffic crashes. As a result, it exaggerates the problem of DUI – which the road lobby likes because they can blame traffic fatalities on the “epidemic” of drunk drivers rather than their dangerous stroad designs.

The low-emission zone only reduced total car traffic by around 5-10%. The reduction in driving to school is much higher than expected.

Most voters don’t have an attorney checking their mail-in ballot.

Nevada uses two forms for gathering signatures, one for candidates and another for ballot initiatives. The Secretary of State gave the Green Party the wrong form. The forms are basically identical.

It is not the first time Democrats has used dubious methods to deprive Green Party ballot access.

Tesla has notoriously bad rear visibility. And just being a larger vehicle means more blind spots no matter how many cameras/sensors are used to compensate. I’ve unfortunately been a passenger enough times to know Tesla’s collision avoidance stuff doesn’t work at all.

The statista link isn’t publicly readable, but other sources say Mustang-ev is #3. Ford calls it an SUV. Long-term, the Administration is subsidizing 1-for-1 replacement of the fleet with EV equivalent – so expect much more SUV/truck in the EV sector if they get their way.

• Heavier vehicles have worse emergency maneuver and braking performance
• Majority of EV’s sold in the US are SUV/crossovers which have the same visibility issues
• EV’s have ridiculously high rates of acceleration, leading to dangerous driving

It would also help to provide some type of calculation or explanation for how they even came up with that number. Reading the report, the 5% looks made-up.

LOL ok you got me there. I mean driving is the dominant mode in SF.

Nope, the map color is correct for San Francisco.

Has nothing to do with the number of properties. The rule would apply to any owner having at least 50 units under management. A single mid-sized apartment building might qualify.

Yimby is about removing the red-tape that prevents development. There is no bigger red-tape than rent-control. Even if all other restrictions, such as SFH zoning, were removed it wouldn’t matter because nobody will build in areas with rent control.

What a bunch of BS. Kamala Harris is pushing rent control – the complete opposite of Yimby.

Nothing unusual? On the same day he got the noise ticket, he received tickets for running a red light and speeding in a school zone.

There is no contradiction. Just because the vehicle is licensed for street use doesn’t give the owner permission to operate it in ways that violates the law.