• 0 Posts
  • 279 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle







  • If you follow discourse on this subject, you will see an intent to obscure research into dog attacks and mislead reports on dog type from places like r/pitbull.

    This question could be answered by genetic dog breed testing of dangerous dogs, but that’s not law anywhere IIRC. That Purdue study is, for lack of a better term, normalized aggression research on breeds which is valuable. They mention Dachschunds being high on multiple stats, but a Dachschunds ability to maul is very different from larger type dogs like German Shepards or Pitbulls.

    People who argue “bad training” purposefully ignore the idea and influences of domestication, as a whole, and don’t mention genetically influenced behaviors from other animal species.

    We should all be supporting research into dog types and general safety / behavior of these (generally) wonderful creatures that we domesticated and live with in close proximity.



  • Jaderick@lemmy.worldtoBan PitBulls@lemmy.caThe quickest turn off
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    This statement is a gross denial of the influence of genetics on behavior. A fox hunts because it’s partially hardwired to sate its omnivorous diet with small vertebrates. As does a snake, with no teaching influences from a parental figure.

    Similarly, a short hair pointer dog points, not purely because it is taught.

    Pitbulls were bred as fighting dogs in England from the 19th century onward. There’s a reason they have stocky bodies, frog mouths, and short fur.