

15 square meters isn’t the same as 15m×15m, it’d be a little smaller than 4m×4m. Still a big hole.
15 square meters isn’t the same as 15m×15m, it’d be a little smaller than 4m×4m. Still a big hole.
Jury nullification only helps if you get an actual jury.
Just a rock or a knife, if you wear the animal down enough. You’re probably not biting through the hide though.
Aaron Rodgers, since he turned into the Q-B
More like homicidally stupid.
I’ve camped there, it’s pretty nice!
The ‘S’ in IOT stands for Secure
Why the fuck is it that when a law is found to be unconstitutional, the state(s) are allowed to keep the law on the books but just can’t enforce it? I’d think part of such a decision would include a requirement to repeal the offending law.
We definitely whip shitties in WI, too.
For those wondering, this played out well! OP found someone to take the job. His wife bit on the prank gleefully, was actually thrilled by the idea that OP had a son he didn’t know about. When the prank was revealed, she thought it was hilarious. Ultimately pretty wholesome, OP married a keeper.
You don’t even have to passive voice it - a simple “I felt upset” is fully valid without assigning blame.
Have you looked into Ubiquiti equipment? They’re generally pretty solid, and might have everything you need.
It still falls back onto the driver, as they chose to start driving without everyone buckled in.
Eh, at most you can say a plurality of those who voted when he was elected in 2020 checked the box by his name. We’ll see whether this dipshit gets reelected.
The word you’re looking for is ‘gleaning’; ‘gleaming’ is more like ‘shiny’.
I’ve always wondered, does the ear experience additional, unheard “loudness” when using ANC?
Absolutely! Biometrics are at best a username, not a password.
Doesn’t happen with spacecraft either, despite what Hollywood often depicts. In order to ‘stop’ in space, you actually have to generate thrust. The scary thing that can happen if you lose your engine in space isn’t getting stuck in one place, it’s smashing into your destination at full speed.
You don’t actually need to continue your taper through the bridle joint; just start your taper behind the joint.
This first part parses to me as “Of gender-affirming surgical procedures identified, 1591 of 2664 adult surgeries (59.7%) and 82 of 85 minor child surgeries (96.4%) were chest-related procedures, respectively.” However, the next sentence doesn’t seem to line up with that notion…
To make this section easier to read, I replaced some words and phrases while hopefully keeping the meaning intact.
I kind of feel like this quote is referencing two different data sets, and is missing a segue. The numbers don’t seem to line up with each other any way I poke at them.