So either multiple people with PhDs that have written extensively on the subject are correct and you didn’t comprehend their point, or you, who failed to comprehend even the wiki page on Liberalism, know more.

It’s pretty obvious which is the case when you read through the article, even more so when you read when laissez faire is mentioned multiple times.

I have you tagged as a Zionist from previous conversations, you got no say on the concept of human rights when you’ve repeatedly defended that type of fascism in the past.

Neither liberalism nor neoliberalism can be grasped coherently without talking about capitalism and democracy. If liberalism names the political ideology aligned to the historical emergence of “free market” capitalism and Western-style representative democracy, neoliberalism signifies a particular regime of liberalism, capitalism, and democracy that has been globalized since the 1970s, in the form of an active state promotion of market and competition principles that critics see as antithetical to democracy.

• Liberalism and Neoliberalism (Sean Phelan, PhD and Simon Dawes, PhD)

Genocide Don.

Foreign policy is, for the most part, uniparty in the US

PTB for sure, there is a mountain of evidence, even in just the last month (let alone even before Oct 7), that prove you’re right

Hamas is a resistance group. The IOF commits genocide on a daily basis. Go away, Zionist

I look to see if the product in on the BDS list. The No Thanks app makes it as easy as a search or barcode scan

Fuck feddit.org and anyone that defends Zionism or suppresses anti-zionism. Trying to justify following Germany’s pro-zionist laws instead of a workaround is a pathetic excuse

The EuroMod admins even tried to deny the systemic rape of Palestinian prisoners, even after a huge amount of detailed reports by human rights organizations were linked, which they very clearly didn’t even read

Everyone should be able to live a comfortable life regardless of occupation, that should be goal at least imo

Well, liberalism is ultimately incompatible with human rights. As evident by how it historically and currently sides with fascism and the existence of liberal zionism

Isn’t his net worth in the millions?

Nike supports apartheid, no one should take their money or buy their products

The Anti-Sweatshop Against Apartheid website created a series called ​“The Cashing in on Apartheid” which highlights brands profiting from the occupation and ethnic cleansing of Palestine. The focus here is on Nike, which is accused of financially benefiting from Israel’s colonisation through its renewable energy purchases and manufacturing ties in occupied Palestinian land.

?

They are openly advocating against an ongoing genocide that our governments are funding unconditionally in opposition to the vast majority of the populations

And I don’t think Kapernick’s activism made him any less popular, I also don’t follow football

His popularity will only grow from this, same with Kneecaps

Democratic Party Leader Chuck Schumer: ‘My Job is to Keep the Left Pro-Israel’

In an early signal that Sanders may be right about the party leadership not learning any new lessons, Axios reported Thursday that “many Democratic leaders and donors are panicking” about Mamdani’s win—noting that some party leaders have congratulated but not endorsed him, while other officials continue to speak out against him.

Oh they know, they just work at the behest of their billionaire and corporate donors, not the working class

It’s already shown to be an ineffective way to slander him, the more they harp on this the more it’ll backfire imo

I’m not interested in how you justify your support for Zionism. Supporting fascism is no different than being fascist. The only option is to end it completely, as with other fascist projects in the past.

very generous.

Apartheid isn’t ‘generous’

Counter Insurgency and living under the occupation of violent supremacists is not ‘autonomy’

Quit apologizing for fascism

Hell no. Rabin was was also a fascist and supported ethnic cleansing. Zionism has always been a fascist ideology centered on the forced removal of the native Palestinians.

Then-Israeli ambassador to the US Yitzhak Rabin confirmed the goal of the operation was the liquidation of Gaza’s Palestinian refugees via "a natural shifting of population to the East Bank. […] the problem of the refugees of the Gaza Strip should not be solved in Gaza or al-Arish [Sinai] but mainly in the East Bank,” by which he meant Jordan.

https://palestinenexus.com/articles/israels-ethnic-cleansing-of-the-palestinians-1968-1993

Under Israel’s then-defence minister Yitzhak Rabin’s orders, Israeli army commanders were instructed to break the bones of Palestinian protesters. Today, this policy has evolved to specifically target the knees and legs of Palestinian youth to disable them.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/12/10/stories-from-the-first-intifada-they-broke-my-bones

In his memoirs, which were censored by Israel but leaked to the New York Times in 1979, Rabin recalled a conversation he had with David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, regarding the fate of the Palestinians of Lydd and Ramla, writing: “We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. [Commander Yigal] Allon repeated his question, ‘What is to be done with the Palestinian population?’ Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘Drive them out!’… I agreed that it was essential to drive the inhabitants out.”

As an officer in the army, he led “Operation Danny” to capture Ramla and Lydda. In what became known as the Lydda death march, tens of thousands of Palestinians were expelled from those Palestinian villages. The military order signed by Rabin, the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) reported, read: “The inhabitants of Lydda must be expelled quickly, without regard to age.”

The Oslo Accords were never about reaching a compromise, let alone a just peace. Israel entered into bilateral negotiations with the PLO in order to defuse and control Palestinian resistance, remake their public image to the world, and, most importantly, to codify and entrench the power imbalance on the ground.

The framework of the Oslo Accords set in motion decades of failed negotiations and continued subjugation. The Palestinians formally recognized “the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security.” In return, Rabin’s government neither accepted the goal of a Palestinian state, nor offered guarantees that the settlement construction would stop. The “Declaration of Principles” did not mention the word “occupation.”

Instead of a Palestinian state, the Oslo Accords offered a limited autonomy, under the direction of a newly created Palestinian Authority. Israel maintained its control over borders, airspace, and waters. Behind the fig leaf of a “peace process,” Israel continued to expand illegal settlements, tightened curfews and closures, and debilitated the Palestinian economy.

As the IMEU explains: “Today Palestinians live in a series of isolated ghettos in the occupied territories, surrounded by Israeli walls, military checkpoints, and bases, and settlements, under a system of racial segregation, discrimination, and apartheid, all based on the Oslo Accords.”

https://jacobin.com/2020/09/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-yitzhak-rabin-israel-palestine

Leaked official documents show that that civilan kills were far higher than the public was led to believe, they deliberately miscategorized civilians as combatants as much as they could get away with

• https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/the-assassination-complex/

They always refuse to reconcile with the incredibly detailed reporting by human rights organizations about exactly how it fits the definition of genocide