Keld [he/him, any]

Actually wait. I probably shouldn’t use people’s real names here.

Sadly they got around that issue. It’s only holy water as long as it remains fully water, and it’s only holy if its not in a natural vessel. So you can’t pour holy water in the ocean and kill off the entire vampire population. Which means most of the water has been unholied. However. What about ice cubes? Can I holy up my drink a little? (Also can I shoot holy ice cubes at demons?)

Santa deniers: “Oh all the parents of the world are just pretending that Santa is giving the gifts, all parents in the entire world are engaged in a conspiracy just to bring a little bit of whimsy into the lives of children. Ignore the massive multi government cover up that would be necessary to keep this secret under wraps”

Santa believers: “Santa gifts are what they say they are”

Another pope had coffee baptised so it wouldn’t be sinful to drink. (or at least I’ve heard that story I never bothered checking out its authenticity.)

Which means we can assume they’re mostly doing uppers in the Vatican

My recipe said blender, and cleaning a blender is annoying. Also I added caramel because I’m a little treat hog.

You would have to be actually holding the skull to notice, and even then you probably wouldn’t notice.

I don’t care about Pluto directly, I care about the definition of planet being ridiculous and seemingly made up explicitly to demote Pluto while keeping the “core” planets and failing to do so if applied with any rigor. It is also such an arbitrary definition it doesn’t apply outside our solar system and NASA missions ignore it. It’s bad science.

so Neptune and earth have indeed cleared their orbit

No they haven’t. As your quoted part had to point out with the words “To a greater extent”

Let me be clear here then: 1: The definition does not concern itself about mass or size beyond the object reaching a hydrostatic equilibrium that’s round. Pluto is cut off because of its location, not its size. The same goes for other objects like a lot of moons and every dwarf planet.

2: it’s inconsistently applied.

3: I’m pointing out some utter bullshit I just found out on a website for shitposting, not starting a petition or mailing threats to Mike Brown.

Okay but the definition doesn’t cut off based on size, but based on the relative size of nearby objects, and I already pointed out that the definition is inconsistently applied. If Pluto and Mercury switched places, by this current definition it would be a planet (And what about when they’re at the point where Pluto and Neptune make each other non planets would mercury then become a non planet? And I don’t even know if Mercury could clear the orbit that far out, would Mercury become a non planet because there are larger asteroids in the kuiper belt). That’s not a definition that’s actually consistent, nor is it one that’s actually based on size.

And even the earth does not clear its orbit, there’s a bunch of NEAs. Is the Earth not a planet?

It’s just some nonsense they made up and the definition sucks and I can’t find a good defense of it.

edit: Hold on, I just devised a thought experiment. Imagine we take the moon as it exists now, we ctrl-c, ctrl-v’d it to a solar system without any other celestial bodies in it. Bam, it’s a planet… Except if we added a couple of moons instead of just one, because they wouldn’t clear each other so they would become dwarf planets. Depending on the same objects relative position it can be a moon, a dwarf planet or a planet without changing any actual inherent property of the object itself.

The judge (Christopher M. Lopez) basically let him get away with it, so he hasn’t paid squat to the victims and he still has control of infowars because Judge Christopher M. Lopez is a partisan hack ruling that all his bullshit lies that were rightfully called out by previous judges are actually legit and you can’t make him sell infowars because the parent company he created out of whole cloth specifically to avoid having to sell the company that exists for no other reason than avoiding the legal repurcussions of his actions is legit, and that only the part that Alex Jones owns himself could be bought by the Onion and then none of his ownership of the parent company (Which means that no part of Infowars could be sold essentially, because of obvious straw owners [That the hack Christopher Lopez has decided are legit, when it was pointed out years ago that it’s obviously bullshit] and the existence of the parent company to which he transferred ownership)

I’m a crackpot now. The academic establishment is wrong. Pluto is a planet and Mike Brown and other astronomers downgraded Pluto purely because they were mad that Pluto being a planet made their discoveries seem less impressive by comparison.

Pluto should be a planet. The definition of planet that excludes pluto is a bad definition, it does not include exoplanets that don’t orbit a sun and “Clearing it’s orbit” is an arbitrary definition that means a planet is only a planet if there’s not anything else big in its orbital path. Also what if mercury crosses the orbit of another planet, does either or both planets stop being a planet while that’s happening.

Astronomers, justify yourselves.

Edit: wait, hold on. Neptune and Pluto crosses their orbits. Neptune isn’t a planet by this definition. And like the definition of “Dwarf planet” is stupid too, because it isn’t defined by any kind of actual size. Mercury is only like twice the size of pluto… what’s the limit. Where’s the limit. I started off wanting to make a joke about the Pluto thing being messed up, but the pluto thing is actually messed up. This genuinely seems like they sat down and tried to work out a definition that made Pluto not a planet and couldn’t come up with anything real.

Emperor Transpatine fighting the CIS

It’s ironic like little john. It’s actually the good towns.

omg, karen, you can’t just ask people if they’re a spectre haunting europe.

This is good but not worth the effort.

I’m gonna try and make a frappucino. Stand back

I’m not gonna list all of the stuff on this list because I know that could hurt trans people and make them self conscious. But if this is the list in medical textbooks then literally don’t worry about it.

Seriously you can’t introduce a segment with “there are many obvious differences between men and women” and then have a thing about the size of the protuberantia occipitalis externa (Women apparently tend to have a more prominent one)