Kaiserreich is the usual suspect, but surprisingly The Fire Rises is also pretty good. It’s not positive (and depends on the country given the different teams). I reccomend the china paths (although it references “xinjiang” methods or whatever, but it doesn’t reference that stuff too much). There’s also red world, which allows you to shoot Gorbachev and making fully automated cybernetic production communism in the USSR.

That and there’s a line. The post is vague do maybe I’m misinterpreting, but when I say “let people enjoy things” I’m less talking about people who critique art in an artistic sense and more so the people (i.e, r/patientgamers on reddit) who are like “oh my god (Insert game here) is so slow and boring I cannot believe anyone would like this walking simulator? Don’t the devs understand that I have a job?” At least in my experience that’s what I see mostly, and its so annoying. Let me like different things than you, why is it my or the devs fault that you picked a game that you don’t mesh with personally.

Yeah I dont understand how games journalism is so bad specifically. It’s so infuriating trying to find out about something only for an article to waffle on about nothing for 5 pages

Well there’s not a lot of options, since most of the screen has a black background.

Honestly I just can’t buy it because of the price. Honestly I like the concepts but I think the civ swapping mechanics need to be critically thought about much better. Because I like the idea but every game that has tried always falters. Unsure if it’s poor execution or if the concept is doomed to fail.

Also I am begging the Devs to make Sun Yat-sen a leader at some point. Please, thats the closest acceptable thing to modern China we can get. Cmon you’ve got come Wu Zetian you can do Sun, pleeeeaaasssee Firaxis