Just baffles me how some people can be so intolerant.
Yes, it was a reply to your comment that literally says “Just baffles me how some people can be so intolerant.” How is my comment not understood that it relates to those people, I don’t know.
Just baffles me how some people can be so intolerant.
Yes, it was a reply to your comment that literally says “Just baffles me how some people can be so intolerant.” How is my comment not understood that it relates to those people, I don’t know.
No, you got it right. Seems like combination of a, perhaps, not exactly clear message and trigger happy downvoters results in … downvoting.
Right. And usually the loudest ones are hidden LGBTQ+ cowards.
Edit: To make it clearer - what @SorteKanin@feddit.dk said: “that most of these super intolerant people are actually closeted LGBTQ+ people that are ashamed of themselves. E.g. the at this point almost common story of an anti-LGBT politician seen at a gay orgy or whatever.” Thanks for downvoting spree, though :)
Yes, true. Albeit they have worse energy density and some advantages as well.
Solid state batteries are supposedly much more fire resistant.
Hey, no worries. It’s interesting how nature changes.
Yes, true, it’s one of the 40,000+ “accidents”.
That’s interesting. You have an url handy for now details? Even if this wasn’t the case, fossil generation isn’t real feasible for us anyway.
TIL. But I’m not convinced that this would solve the problem for good. But it certainly helps with growth.
Yes, however the article lists it as a power source (of course it’s great for building if possible) hence I’m looking at that aspect only. It’s more suitable for heating, however, again, at scale it would be problematic (at that’s not even a big one) plus emissions are not healthy. If you ignore emissions and use it for heating of few areas here and there (like it is a trend with pellets), taking into account growth rate, it could be a renewable I suppose.
That certainly helps, but still, at scale is hardly sustainable.
If you look at it like that, fossil is renewable as well. Just a tiny bit slower, but still, given enough time … :)
Sure, that’s all nice. However at what scale is that sustainable? Also burning wood yields all sorts of fine particles, not just CO2, which are not good for humans. Plus we are reducing forests at global level. Can you imagine the forest area for providing power to a whole city?
Is biomass renewable, though? I mean it takes a lot of time for a tree to grow. A lot.
Apparently US doesn’t have problems even if Israel attacks their own warships… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident Why would a bunch of individuals matter…
IDF had all rights to defend themselves /s
C# is awesome, however it has one big issue when it comes to games - garbage collection that can start at any moment and you have no control over it. There are ways to workaround but none is 100%. OTOH from similar level languages there is Swift that does reference counting instead and doesn’t have this problem, albeit has a reference counting problem (where cyclic reference would create a memory leak, but this problem is solvable).
I’m not sure that serious ML doesn’t need a huge graphics card.
Aligns well with Trump’s republicans I guess.
Sure, misunderstandings happen. However my comment was a reply, not a comment under the post. No big deal anyway.