When I see such hardware, I directly go to see if it provides its sources. It does: https://github.com/ROCKNIX/distribution

Just a reminder that those funky hardwares are full of open source software builds (often emulators) and often does not follow the GPL licence licence and providing source code back. Things are moving in the good direction but I thinks its important for us, as user, to complain about GPL licence, specifically for such hardware that often needs updates.

This one seems pretty serious.

I like Nintendo pushing for paid-yet-good video game with events instead of micro transaction model. MTs hurt your brain.

Minetee or Craftee

I have a bad feeling about Switch performances for this. I don’t remember any non-Nintendo open world game that work fine on Switch.

Looks pretty cool. Hoping performance to be good.

First, the game is not named “Link”, now this…

Such a disappointment!

…and I still have so much cool games to play on it…

Can’t wait for the Fortnite x Mario x Starwars collab…

I always enjoy the Sea, Salt, and Pepper cards and color.

Radlands visuals are phenomenal.

On the other side, the old school ugliness of Star Realms makes it intemporel. Same for War of the Ring that keep old illustrative style.

Am I the only one having some concerns about a technology which organisation is going too widely high profit company dependent?

Even ten years ago many of there hardware was garbage.

Is the culture of Rust/Cargo getting as bad as JS/NPM these days

Thanks for saying it.

When I see some rust projects, they looks like they where managed by JS devs (“1 need, 1 package”) that want to do compiled language… The amount of dependencies can be utterly insane.

For me, it mostly means rust have a strong package system, not that rust have good devs.

I’m doing Python at work and you have to use a many pypi package for financial reasons (yet, I restrict myself as much as possible), but seeing this mindset is scope specific open source project is crazy.

All of this does not means all rust (or JS) devs are bad, its just a consequence of bringing code to the masses: Its a good thing in many way. Lets acknowledge this and not being impressed by badly engineered dependency choices.

Euro:

• Lack of randomness.
• Few direct confrontation.
• Weak theme.
• Strong focus on mechanics.

Ameritrash:

• Strong theme.
• Mechanics are rough and simple.
• Direct confrontation.
• Dices rolling, everywhere, all the time…

Yes, bad use of API shouldn’t be use as reference, but it also increases Valheim (which does not seems to be the best API us ever):

I can confirm, this also brings Valheim from 45 to 70-80 FPS on my machine (4090M, 7945HX) at 1080p Ultra Settings.

Commit here.

They simply added this line op.max_unroll_iterations = 32;, related to NIR shader compilation. Passed to NIR here.

(I stop here, lost track and interest in further investigation)

All we need is 8K AI scaled Doom 1993 at 120 fps on ourprinter LCD screen.

GPL is basically a contract that code will always be shared if distributed. This licence ensure any distributed library will give your code (legal standpoint).

MIT is more a use as you want licence. Devs can take the code, build and distribute binaries without restrictions.

They are not made for the same reasons. If you want to write Libre software, GPL is your friend.

As other says, rust build statically by default, having a MIT ecosystem help to spread the langage. Yet, this also mean someone can see its code used in a commercial product without sharing back, credits or counterpart.

Different uses.

Munchkin est top, mais bien bruyant !

Je suis passé à côté, merci @Camus !

Wingspan est très bien pour les couples. Du beau matériel, assez simple, et ça peut être présenté à d’autres joueurs. C’est très calme, assez casu. Par contre, ce n’est pas du tout la baston ; chacun joue un peu dans son coin en essayant de marquer le plus de points, ça dépend donc du tempérament. Ça reste une valeur sur.

J’aime bien Metro X qui mets une bonne ambiance autour de la table. Chacun fait sa ligne de métro et on ne peut s’empêcher de se comparer aux autres. Mais il est très limité à deux joueurs. C’est un jeu pour démarrer la soirée.

Je vois qu’on t’a proposé Terraforming Mars qui est excellent, mais je trouve que c’est comme Small World, ça ne commence à être intéressant qu’à partir de 3 joueurs.

Sea, Salt and Paper est parfait à 2 et très très bon à 3. À 4 c’est toujours très bon, mais difficile à contrôler (la chance devient beaucoup trop prépondarante). Ma review ici

Azul n’est pas mon style, mais il est aussi considéré comme un jeu à 2+ efficace.

Je vois que vous avez Jekyll vs Hyde. C’est un jeu de plis focalisé sur le 2 joueurs. Je t’invite à te tourner vers The Crew qui partage la même mécanique, mais tourné vers le 3+. Très prenant.

Oriflamme est un jeu 3+, mais les auteurs ont publié d’excellentes règles 2 joueurs (sur leur site, il me semble). J’adore ce jeu quand tu as du monde. Les gens comprennent vite et la tension est palpable.

Et si tu es intéressé, tu peux t’abonner à !jeuxdesociete@lemmy.world, j’essaye de mettre des reviews.

En espérant que cette liste t’offre de nouvelles idées !

I was a fan of STALKER. What is Anomaly?

Not sure where this entitlement is coming from.

Being nice.