A public statement “z is detained for y” is generally expected compared to the usual “no one has seen x from china lately, they probably got held by the govt”

No clue the details, looked it up out of curiosity when I had the same question as you but didn’t read it

Tsundere who vents the dere by speaking in her native language.

MC understands Russian, unknown to her.

It looks to be based on user ratings (for the sort), and could change dynamically

Likely a lot of people dog piled on Tesla, then read the others.

The Tesla one’s main issue is “they grab a lot of data and don’t seem competent protecting it” which is less bad than “we will sell your sexual history if we can grab it from the car, and have a lot of sensors too”

Glad to help, I think most here were confused because there’s otherwise no issue with oathbreaker subclass and murder lol

You got me curious enough to try to understand the mechanics of what you mean, since I thought if you already were oathbreaker there’s no problem

I see one post from someone saying the oathbreaker knight can aggro you, depending on which camp you rest at. Most will be fine, but some place the knight close enough to be angry

Is that your issue?

It’s not ideal in a few ways, but I think the bigger thing here is at least one employee is willing to risk their job to prove that they agree with her and use the recording as identity proof

A self driving car (or a personal driver, not a bus)

I could just modify the thing to sleep in it. Sleep through the commute

That’s true, I just wonder if open source changes anything, legally. Unless one term of the breakup is “will not contribute to chromium”

I think the poster is making a good point though- In this split, google the advertising company can freely contribute to the open source chromium. You need some model that leads the chromium maintainer to reject changes like this.