Ballot access for NYC mayorial candidacy is 100% officiated. There are explicit rules and requirements that if you meet you are 100% GUARANTEED ballot access. By simply winning the primary, he is 100% guaranteed to be on that Mayoral Ballot. He is also 100% allowed to run with under the Democratic Ticket. There is nothing at all the DNC, a national grifter org, can do to affect his access to the NYC Mayoral Ballot.

They can choose to gather signature and run Cuomo, they can run back other candidates, they can spend millions backing the AIPAC preferred candidates, but they are going to do that regardless of what Mamdani does or says.

Winning the Democratic Primary guarantees him a spot on the ballot. If the gormless dems want to pull some strings and run Cuomo as well they can certainly do that. Compromising with Nazis isn’t going to help Mamdani.

While I don’t believe the right is all Hitlers, are we able to agree that at least some small subset of them and of their leadership have truly disturbing ideals and goals that could fairly be compared to those of Nazis?

Who cares? How does that have anything to do with the elimination of profit motive in all social goods.

Mamdani needs to run to get the DNC suckups to get on board though

why does Mamdani need any of that support at all? He has the nom, he is on the ballot, NYC will be voting for him. Obama and the DNC aren’t needed at all.

gross

If at least two civilizations exist in the universe, but they can never interact, let alone communicate, how can you not describe both of them as alone?

Hell yea. I’m glad some people are finally seeing the ADL for what it has always been, a Zionist propaganda org.

Why haven’t they leaked or better yet prosecuted based off of this information they have?

One neat trick to maintain profit in the short-term: reduce services, extract additional value from your workers. Will work long enough to retire as an executive. For anyone else you are SOL, lol.

I read the article. In-fact I started this thread asking for clarification to whom these laws apply. Then you went off on a tangent about Zuckerberg and implied i’m a “chud.” So let me state how I think these laws apply, tell me if this is correct.

The Nation of Brazil passes a law that says the users of a website have to abide by Brazil’s laws. I don’t know what they meant by that, I assume lemmy.ml that is not hosted in Brazil isn’t expected to know nor care about what Brazil’s laws say. But if that were the case, then Facebook also wouldn’t be expected to know nor care about what Brazil’s laws say. The citizens of brazil that use facebook? Sure, they should be subject to those laws. But why should any other entity that exists outside of Brazil be obligated to know nor care about Brazilian law?

Those details seem pretty important, and the article doesn’t address them at all, it merely says that Brazil’s supreme court says that website are required to “deplatform” and “delete posts” of users who broke the law. But why should lemmy.ml abide by brazilian laws?

Which countries laws “ALREADY APPL[Y] TO EVERYONE ELSE?” Cause I’m pretty sure that isn’t how laws of other countries work. I understand that you want countries to pass laws making it illegal for people to make fun of you on the Internet, but that’s a laughable notion.

That is the natural extension of your line of thinking is it not? Which users are “persecutable” by brazilian/Israeli law? If it’s not just the citizens of Brazil (which i’m ok with, obviously a nation should be able to pass laws that apply to their citizens) but everyone “persecutable,” doesn’t that mean that a country that is sufficiently able to persecute anyone in the world is now justified to enforce their laws upon the entire world?

So is lemmy.ml breaking the law in brazil right now? And rather then laughing at the notion, you think it’s a good thing? Yea you should probably change your name to Avatar of Fascism.

So you are telling me that when Israel makes their definition of “anti-semitism” illegal that everyone in the entire world that uses the internet has to abide by it? That doesn’t seem desirable or sane at all.

In 2014, after years of debate, Brazil’s Congress ratified Law 12.965/2014, the Internet Civil Framework. This law required social media companies to delete posts and deplatform users who broke Brazilian laws. However, it placed the burden on Brazilian courts to identify the posts and accounts.

Is this meant to apply to all “users” of the platform or only Brazilian Citizens?

If it applies to Brazilian Citizens, that’s all fine and good. But if I break brazilian law by criticizing their government, is lemmy.ml expected to “deplatform” and “censor” me?

AoC. Literally any “female” with good policy since much like Clinton and Harris, their gender was the least important part of their loss.

They can’t stop bots on any of the other sites they regulate either.

Why not? They are doing edge caching, they can literally just block the connection from visiting the site just like they do with their DDoS mitigation.

He campaigned as a socialist, he turned-coat a few months into his first term.

Source: Trust me bro. I’m super sexist and also friends with super sexist people and I can tell you that my super sexist bro’s yearn for tax cuts for entrepreneurs who run a business for 3 years in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Trust me bro.

Agreed, no reason to give them reprieve. Let them try again and this time the gerontocracy is weaker then it has ever been.