It’s not their own solution, but SecureGo - AFAIK a common third-party 2FA app in Europe
Switch banks.
I don’t like your… encroaching tone.
Also: no available bank here supports common FOSS 2FA solutions. All use SecureGo, or something similar.
When I want to do any transactions on my bank account, I need to verify it with my bank’s 2FA app.
That app doesn’t work on waydroid (I tried) and needs a “certified” device.
Not for 2FA
Banking apps supported?
That only works for so long, because the system isn’t stable that way. Capitalism requires some sort of exploitation. If that exploitation is hindered for too long, capitalism will become in crisis.
This chapter explains why that deal didn’t continue in Europe
Also: if you tax the rich too much, they will conduct a capital strike, where they stdpinvesting in the country, or move their business somewhere else. That bit isn’t just a bogeyman from conservatives. It has some merit. Social democracy just isn’t a stable system.
Yeah… and hou sustainable did it turn out to be?
but the degree to which it furthers society is difficult to quantise.
That’s because “furthering of society” doesn’t have a well defined metric.
… so why quantise it at all?
How is it going in the mental model of the 1950s?
No where here did we make it facist saying “you did not come from here, get out.” That is not our argument.
I disagree. I think that’s a core assumend premise of the video. Otherwise, the statement that Bibi’s from Poland doesn’t make any coherent sense as an argument.
I disagree with the complete “blood and soil” premise that zionism is based on. But I critisize bs logic, no matter which camp it stated.
I don’t know what else to tell you. “People don’t belong in places were their ancestors aren’t from” is the literal opinion of current real-world racists.
I don’t really adhere to the logic that anargument loses it’s characteristics if you’re unable to enforce it.
If I’m exclaiming “death to all jews”, it’s still antisemitic if I’m unable to hurt a single person.
I really don’t want to downplay the suffering that indigenous peoples are still enduring due to colonization. But the “your ancestors are from xyz, so you don’t belong in abc” is the core statement of ethnopluralism. It doesn’t get better if you’re being an ethnonationalist/ethnopluralist in favour of the “right” peoples.
How is this argument different from ethnopluralism?
What I’m saying is that native people’s deserve recognition of their status as the original inhabitants of a land in opposition to settler-colonialism.
I agree. That’s not what OP was stating. OP’s video said that Bibi Netanyahu doesn’t belong there because his ancestors were polish. That’s an ethnopluralist standpoint.
It’s ridiculous to “both sides” that issue.
I agree. That’s not what I’m doing, though. Israel’s justifications are ridiculous. That’s why you shouldn’t use their kind of justification. Even if it’s pro palestine.
So you’re saying that if a culture has been in a land for a long time, that’s okay?
Then what’s ok? Genuine question. I don’t follow.
Indigenous Australians have been on this land for 60,000 years, they have one of the oldest extant cultures on earth. I personally think they get to say “this land is ours”.
I agree. I also agree that Palestine belongs to the palestinians. But there’s a diffenence between stating that a people has inhabited a land for a long time, resulting in a claim for the land and claiming that some individual person doesn’t belong here, because their family is from someplace else.
Also, you shouldn’t use Israel’s line of reasoning. Let me give you an example of what I mean:
Let’s say you wanted to debunk a real NSDAP Nazi from 1940s Germany. Would you agree with them that different races are stronger than the others and that the strongest must dominate the latter, pointing the out that Germany will lose the war, therefore the German “race” can’t be superior… or will you not give credit to that whole premise outright?
Disengage.
Edit: I wrote why I wanted to disengaged which could have been interpreted as further antagonization.
Do you feel the same about First Nations rights?
Yes. All the racism BS vanishes if you argue with culture instead of genetics.
One of the big false claims is that Palestinians are solely from the Arabian peninsula when that’s just unequivocally false. They’re indigenous to the Levant and it’s an important distinction to fight Zionist propoganda. Palestinians have the right to argue against being ethnically cleansed by stating their multigenerational ties to their home. Just like any First Nations people or other nationality.
I agree. Still not a genetic argument.
You’re concerned about weaponization of ethnonationalist rhetoric in a context where the power dynamics simply do not support such a concept.
Can you explain that to me? I don’t follow.
Yeah, I think that doesn’t work with EU banks.