Yes this graph makes way more sense. The original graph had no base, age is arbitrary to events over time without a date of birth. So if you were born in 1751 and were 5 years old the original says 11% of all emissions happened in your lifetime. It also say if you were born in 2019 and were 5 years old that 11% of all emissions happened in your lifetime. It has static measurements across time when yearly emissions aren’t static.

That’s what I don’t get about this. The point is either to get out of paying or at least make it very difficult. At the same time the cost to Disney as a company with all the bad press and fall out from doing this would be orders of magnitude greater than simply paying the widower compensation. Who signed off on it? The idea that a lawyer can do what ever it takes to win a case while simultaneously destroying the company they work for seems dumb as shit from a purely financial point of view.

It’s more different than better, and by different I mean better

Bread lick-gar.

Bread licka

Left is in common sense units, right is in intelligence units. There is no “freedom” (to be ignorant) units though no.

Also sorry for the burn but it is a deserving burn at least.

Temperature of the body

That’s ridiculous, he’s obviously Jesus Christ.

Snopes says this

What’s True Tobacco enemas were a real and at one time popular medical practice thought to have been able to revive people who had drowned or were otherwise catastrophically ill. What’s False However, the phrase “blow smoke up your ass” appears to have its origins more recently, in the 1960s, and there is no evidence linking it to the long-ago practice of tobacco enemas.

https://www.historyextra.com/period/first-world-war/what-is-the-origin-of-the-phrase-to-blow-smoke-up-someones-arse/

He’s making the fossil fuel industry look bad

Why not throw in some demonic possession while you’re at it

I knew I should have added the /s

The problem is crashing the economy will kill a lot of people right now, no need to wait or come up with a better solution

Doing it as fast as possible would crash the world economy because everything is setup up for oil. So it seems obvious what needs to happen, it’s a different story when you personally are now homeless and you just want a roof and food. We can do a lot better than we are though

Yes absolutely it can.

Disclaimer: This is based on a gut feeling and no actually knowledge of the topic.

This joke is all class. Well done

I’m glad that we switched to recyclable plastics a while back. Imagine how fucked things would be if we didn’t

I’m unsure of what a finite planet is referencing? Is op suggesting that economic limits are constrained to finite resources? This doesn’t take into account renewables, human creativity and a whole list of other things. If we create a matrix like environment where the limits can be expanded and create new products in that new environment we can still use fiat.

No tan

Who cares that’s ages away /s