TechnoAnomie [he/him, any]

  • 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 16th, 2024

help-circle








  • China has to replace that consumer market. This will require China to give up its net exporter status, and to unleash its 1.4 billion consumer market. Doing so would require raising the income and providing social safety nets and jobs guarantee to the Chinese working class. And this will require China to give up its neoliberal ideology. The time to transition into the next phase of socialism was probably a decade ago, but it is still not too late. Adapt or the world dies.

    I’m not equipped to add much, but I don’t think that it entirely correct. While it is just double entry book-keeping that must add up, it is also true that debt forgiveness can rebalance the books. Since random ad-hoc post-facto charity is no way to have stable economies, it would indeed seem to promote a quick and sudden upheaval of China. But would it not be possible to systematize these transfers and changes in a way that is more stable and predicable, such as Keynes designed with the Bancor (and the Euro had a veneer of pretending to do, with very little to no backing of it)?





  • Ukraninan totalitarism video, from a Ukrainian in Kharkov translated by a Ukrainian in Mariupol, about how Ukrainian society devolved into decentralized totalitarianism. Minor brain worms detected, but my radar is not the best.

    I don’t know if it’s old news or contradicted by analysis, but it presented to me a new perspective about how it’s completely fucked. Instead of becoming a nazi regime that was “stabbed in the back”, the complete lack of state authority appears to me will make it divided by militias fighting each other. And since western occupation to maintain stability threatens Russia, if it was affordable and possible in such a vast country, and since Russia couldn’t possibly occupy it either, shit will be very bad.



  • While the regime rapidly continued to develop its artificial intelligence arsenal, the deployment of these technologies has led to mistaken identifications, wrongful arrests, and civilian deaths. […] This situation provides an initial glimpse into how such technologies might be used in future wars, as well as a warning of how these technologies could malfunction or be misused, resulting in the killing of civilians.

    The technology is shit, but its a useful tool for pretending to care about “humane” slaughter, sorry, “precise” bombing and “target” spying.

    I guess there’s a silver lining of the amount of waste in making NATO’s wunderwaffen; if nothing else does it, they will, inevitably, make it crumble.