Seriously? You are going after outliers because i said the obvious point that 14 and 18 year olds look different???
I did mean all that when i said coded, my bad if it seemed as if i only meant their appearance.
Also you second paragraph is all over the place, literally my entire point is that cartoons ages are fake and that’s why the important issue is their coding, not the age given to them by the author (which applies to both a minor coded character who is an adult and viceversa).
Also, hell no, 14-16-18 are all children, but there definitely are physical differences between them.
Fair enough.
I have been saying that all along. The problem is not the supposed age that appears in the wiki. The problem is how the character is coded. Which is way i don’t care if someone sexualizes Jotaro (17) but i hate someone sexualizing Kanna from Dragon Maid (800 years or something like that).
Lmao.
No ofense but i’m not giving sensitive information to a stranger.
Also, what even is the point. If i were a teen you’d say that my opinion would change with age, and if i told you that i am an adult you would either call me a pedo or a loser for caring about said stuff.
My point is very simple. Cartoons are cartoons, they are not real. I care about how the characters are coded, not the age that the author decided to give them (otherwise 800 year old dragon lolis would be ok i guess, but the people i’m arguing with would twist themselves in knots backtracking their points).
Oh, i’m sorry for not being permanently online and not even knowing which thread you mean. My bad.
Lmao. What else is there to say.
THEY ARENT PEOPLE, THEY ARE DRAWINGS
So, you are essentially saying that i could draw the most child that has ever child and as long as i say that they are 50 it’s ok to sexualize them?
You people really need to take a step back and realize what you are saying.
Yeah, my bad. It’s definitely the same thing, time to round up all those women drawing smut of Jojo or Bnha characters.
You people should drop your american puritan worldview, that’s how we end up with Mastercard banning porn games and eventually LGBT games.
(now it’s when you ignore my point and pretend that what i said was “it’s cool to draw hardcore porn of loli-type girls”)
But we are literally talking about anime.
Hell, or even in other types of media, the characters in Riverdale are teenagers being portrayed by adults, i’m not going to police anyone saying that they want to fuck them.
Dude, wtf.
What do you mean “clearly”?? A literal loli archetype?? a character who may as well represent a college student??? It constanly depends of the anime and its art style.
Also, wtf comparing media depictions with actual children.
I’ve watched them and no, he doesn’t. Also, minors??? Do you know the difference between the depiction of a young person in a cartoon (who may as well be 16 or 26) and an actual child???
Jotaro from Jojo is 17, is it ok to be horny for him?
What the hell do you mean calling someone a pedo.
They are drawings representing a young person. She may as well be 16, 18 or 24.
As long as he doesn’t lust over literal children in anime (or the infamous 800 year old child) it’s ok.
But that’s not what happened.
The far right parties tried to organize a minute of silence, the Parliamente denied the request and then they tried to hold it anyway. Now they are crying because the left groups obviously ignored them and sabotaged their shitty attempt.
I’m a communist and i like old James Bond, and The Mines of King Solomon and all those orientalist movies that were basically travel agency ads for british boomers.
I think SarahZ had one or a few videos about it. Something about problematic media, i think?
DAE having a school curriculum is authoritarian because i can’t study le minecraft???
Rude, go touch grass.