• 45 Posts
  • 269 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 23rd, 2022

help-circle






  • Yeah i don’t buy that theory either.

    I think this post has hit on the more likely explanation:

    There are many out there saying that the two efforts in Pokrovsk was some heroic rescue mission to rescue some high ranking general or indeed two very important CIA operatives and indeed because the real reason may be utterly unfathomable to normal human beings, this may well be a narrative that Ukraine ultimately, put out to justify these two hairbrained missions.

    The truth is far more chilling and far more disturbing than most people can possibly fathom, it is also one that no one in the west ultimately wants to admit to or have you realise, indeed, you may still not be able to accept the uncomfortable truth and may opt for a wild conspiracy theory as a comfort blanket. So the facts of the two failures are very straight forward.

    Ukrainian sources claim the operation was to disrupt enemy positions, clear strongpoints, and restore supply lines, this is nonsense and shows that the reason for the operations is even something they wish to conceal.

    The first mission, which was launched the night of 28 October, dropped 11 GUR commandos in an open field northwest of Pokrovsk’s industrial zone. The video showed troops disembarking and fanning out rapidly. Insertion was at night/low visibility to minimize detection, but Russian reconnaissance drones spotted the low-flying helicopter and destroyed the 11 commandos.

    The subsequent mission, which was launched on the night of 30 October using two Blackhawk helicopters, inserted two groups (total ~20–24 troops) in the same general area and they suffered the same fate as the first group.

    That is the bare bones of the mission. Now lets deal with the nonsense of high ranking generals.

    Not a chance. When front line hardened troops and mercenaries were being pulled out of Pokrovosk a week before and raw recruits on suicidal drives were being thrown in to the cauldron, if you think for one moment, some general was left behind, think again.

    Even the Ukrainian radio chatter confirmed this.

    Likewise the very silly idea that two high ranking CIA operatives were inside and had not made it out, while some mercenary soldiers from France were pulled out weeks earlier. It is simply not the case and covers the real reason for the botched missions and that was to plant a flag.

    I will say that again it was to plant a Ukrainian flag on the steelworks.

    Bullshit right ?

    Ok, there have been attempts at flying helicopters in before, remember the suicide mission to the Azovstal steel works?

    Everyone, including yours truly, thinking some high ranking officer must be in there, turned out there was no one of any real importance in there, the men who died trying to get in were carrying a large Ukraine flag found among the wreckage.

    The Ukrainians have form on this before, sending a suicidal dinghy crew to plant a flag in areas already secured by the Russians. In fact, there have been at least three instances of this before.

    There is also the fact that they were dropped in the area of the steel works. Remember the PR battle is vitally important to Ukraine and those in the west.

    Look at how we are holding out bravely against the Russian hordes.

    It is not just a flag, it’s a $10 billion dollar flag, look at this, if only we had more money, more weapons, look our guys will not quit, when 99% have headed for the hills already. In a vastly unpopular war you have to sell, sell, sell when your narrative does not fit the facts, you have to convince your backers it is worth it. But it is not just money the flag represents, it’s an article of faith, of the overwhelming belief in the cause.

    Unless you are a fanatic or have seen them in action your mind cannot fathom the simplicity or the madness of these people.

    https://xcancel.com/ThorntonWa47373/status/1985489790092095703



  • It’s nothing like the tomahawk. For one thing it is vastly more powerful and way faster. It is essentially a non-nuclear nuke, a mid range hypersonic ballistic MIRV. Unstoppable and borderline undetectable until it is too late. The Russians only used it once in Ukraine and they did so without a warhead, and just the kinetic energy was enough to devastate an entire factory complex.

    There is a near zero chance that Russia would give it to Venezuela. It’s too modern of a weapon. They gave it to Belarus but really it’s still Russian specialists who are in control of it, and also Belarus is in a Union State with Russia and an attack on Belarus would be treated as an attack on Russia itself.

    It would be of questionable utility to Venezuela anyway given the nature of the threat it faces which is naval and aerial, not a land army. The Russians have plenty of other much more useful and practical things that they can give and are giving to Venezuela.


  • They’ve been saying for years that the West secretly despises all Russians and wants to see Russia broken up and erased as a culture.

    Certainly helps the Kremlin’s messaging land with Russians that EU politicians are openly holding conferences explicitly discussing how they want to balkanize Russia and steal its resources.

    Putin doesn’t need to rig elections (though his party very likely does do it against the communists in local and regional elections), the West’s idiotic anti-Russian crusade has been the best electoral campaign he could have ever asked for. It is absolutely unsurprising to me that he has a solid 80% support now.

    It also helps that things are going much better in Russia than they are in Europe at the moment. Much as i’d prefer the communists to be in charge instead, it doesn’t help to delude onesself about the current mood in Russia which is overall quite optimistic.










  • You are using the term “revanchism” incorrectly.

    Revanchism refers to seeking a revision or reversal of the outcome of a defeat in a war, such as through regaining lost territories or undoing a humiliation. Japan was the defeated power in the war with China. Japan is the revanchist power in this situation. China has no reason for revanchism, they were the winners of WWII and, at least formally, got all their territories back.



  • Many I’ve seen don’t engage or outright rebuke theory because of low literacy, mental illness, poor quality of life making reading hard, etc. etc. Not to say those don’t inhibit the ability to read and consume theory however most of those things apply to every person I’ve known who has read theory!

    Before the Russian revolution illiterate Russian factory workers would meet and have pamphlets and news paper articles from Lenin and other revolutionaries read to them by someone who could read, they would have passages from Marx and other writers read to them and they would discuss them.

    If even those people who lacked almost any sort of formal education and couldn’t even read could still engage with theory, then a modern Western leftist has no excuse, especially with how many technological aids there are nowadays. If you can browse the Internet you can read/listen to theory.

    It doesn’t mean you’ll understand it, but that’s why study groups are and always will be essential, and again this has become easier than ever to organize with the technology we have to connect people across distances and even language barriers.