just stopping is not that bad of an outcome if I’m being honest. Pulling over would be better.

sounds like he’s frustrated that a clean architecture didn’t magically solve all of his problems

“Anywhere you have your password manager” is useful

Zen has also committed to not include AI features

that is fine, the only requirement AFAIK is the user being in the docker group in case you’re having permission issues running it as user

ok()

It could be considered biochemical warfare

along with the compose.yaml file, unless I need it in a different drive for any reason

yeah, I put rules to highly discourage comments entirely when generating code

Cloudflaring my program

I’ll start using this one

and that indentation defaults in decent editors are usually language dependent. I’m not familiar with these editors, but… come on - if they use one default for all files, OP should use a better tool.

almost as if using a memory safe language actually reduces the CVEs related to memory

most repos use 4 spaces

it’s not like the whole driver is written in unsafe rust

Maybe. The problems I have with codeberg are the lack of support to private repos and the 100 repo limit. I have some personal stuff in version control that I prefer to keep private, like notes, dotfiles, and shell history.

At the same time, I’m not sure I want to maintain a self-hosted forge.

but the whole thing is self-hosted, not just the action runner, right?

Well, the opt-out argument really doesn’t make any sense. The fact there’s an opt-out tells me nothing about how deeply a feature is embedded, if anything, it tells me the exact opposite of what the article argues: the only reason we can disable it is because it’s not deeply integrated. If it was, there most likely wouldn’t be an opt-out.

not AI, and still not open source either

any alternatives to GH that allow private repos and self-hosted action runners?

sick, pyrefly also transitioned to beta a few weeks ago, looking forward to finally replacing pylance/pyright.