What’s signal doing now?

Fair lol

I thought he wanted ice cream

More a statement of how little he did to prevent this scenario/how shit of a president he was

They agree that nothing should ever be able to touch their money or power

as long as I did goodest job it’ll be okay

Well that and before going super war hawk in her nomination acceptance speech.

That tiny minority of never trumpers

Plus organizing means a bunch of people to ask for glass beer bottles for molotovs!

Yeah but glass beer bottles much more of a pain to deal with. Always worried they’ll get shattered

I can’t wait for dnc to again decide to go harder right because of their failures

Not the candidate running a terrible campaign or the dnc not doing an actual primary?

There’s so many reasons for this and your just gonna blame the voters the party always drives away?

Removed or made it harder to vote on/near campuses is a big one. Along with lowering number of places to vote.

Plus some states moving away from early voting or mail in ballots.

https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/changes-election-laws-may-affect-youth-voting-2024

So just like the dnc always has?

Or in places that took massive measures to prevent or decrease youth voting

I’ve gotten the same from dnc, just without the picture of a person on it

Treating others like a child and being a pedantic asshole will usually get you that response.

It’s amazing how many words you use to also say nothing

Fuck off back to reddit

A 2018 year-in-review and prospective on fact-checking from the Poynter Institute (which develops PolitiFact[27]) noted a proliferation of credibility score projects, including Media/Bias Fact Check, writing that “While these projects are, in theory, a good addition to the efforts combating misinformation, they have the potential to misfire,” and stating that “Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific.”[6] Also in 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as “an armchair media analysis”[28] and characterized their assessments as “subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in”.[29] A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: “While [Media Bias/Fact Check’s] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems.”[19]

I’m trying to summarize the wiki reasoning/what’s in the wiki page about mbfc criticisms

They’re saying the parts mbfc uses other data from is fine, like the fact checking matching others as they all use the same source. But the rest like bias can’t be trusted as it’s just their own unscientific methods.