It will surely be more attempts, but this is huge and means you’ll always have the hability to have an encrypted service like signal which was the big danger here
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
But they are pretty clear about that. Also, how is that worse than Google or bing? It’s not a dream sure, but its a lot better than your money going to Google
Considering the war in ukr rn exists bc nobody helped ukr the first time, I think we should give the right message to Putin so that it doesn’t start another war
joelimgu@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Sceptics, look away: a mostly renewable electricity grid is highly feasibleEnglish6·1 year agoSure, bc its the easiest path. But some gas for peak hours is totally fine. The problem is in countries like the US or Germany where over 50% of the electricity comes from fossil fuels. At least that should be the goal on the short term
joelimgu@lemmy.worldto Privacy@programming.dev•France bans ministers from WhatsApp, Signal; demands French alternatives.291·2 years agoI can understand the WhatsApp part, its a closed source app but it makes no sense to ban an open source app bc of security concerns, just order a study of the source code to validate it
joelimgu@lemmy.worldto Privacy@programming.dev•eIDAS 2.0 Sets a Dangerous Precedent for Web Security61·2 years agoUntil now the EU has made a good job of listening to experts. I hope this trend continues and that the law changes. Its so incredubly dumb for govs to force an identification method that hase savety vulnerabilities
This has already happened with things like Tsunami in Catalonia. A totally decentralised movement that the police is still trying to understand 6y later and trying to find a nonexistant leadership. Incredible fun to watch them trying to understand how it worked