I do think they have a point: there’s not many other engines I can think of that are quite as ‘tangible’ as theirs. Every object has its physical place in the world and can be picked up, manipulated,… in a way that’s unlike other engines where the world just feels more static.

I dab too, there are dozens of us!

The only upside is that we might get another epically long Milo Rossi debunking

That honestly seems pretty low for friend.com

Although the fact they’re developing hardware on less than a million dollar budget is bananas, let alone the other whack ideas

On the other hand, those coalition talks can take months or longer with the old government continuing to run things for sometimes over a year after the elections. Looking at you, Belgium

Yeah, in fact I think that’s a majority of those cases. Vocal minority of reactionaries and/or fans disappointed that their expectations weren’t met despite the product on its own being good

Oh, that’s not even showing as a missing character, to me it just looks like 0.9

At least we agree 0.99… = 1

0.9 is most definitely not equal to 1

Not for a couple of decades he hasn’t, see Spaceballs the series or crazy history of the world part 2

And DNS issues

They work on light scratches, but anything too deep will damage the data layer. However, you can do a lot with cloth and toothpaste

Those were legit, though, you can resurface optical media to allow it to be read again

I remember seeing a hypothesis that ADHD would have been beneficial in Hunter-gathering, as you would more quickly move from plant to plant rather than fully depleting a resource. It was just one study where they had a sort of game/simulation to test it though, so very early days on that theory.

A nuclear power plant doesn’t pollute either of those more than any other large building, and sure uranium mining is still mining, but renewables and battery storage also depend on raw mined materials.

As long as they don’t start building tunnels under their house because they’re an ‘engineer’…

Peer-reviewed NYT op-Eds (/s)

The meme may be true, but it is less meaningful than you might assume at first glance. The obvious comparison is those memes comparing wages or dollar values with house prices, where obviously inflation has made a huge difference in 100 years. However, you should compare it to other types of investment, so does a stock index grow as fast as home prices or not?

Also, all those tube sites are littered with ads.

200 is on the high end, and not all of it needs to be desalinated

This is like the r/edc guys whipping out their knives at every opportunity or r/guns hoping some day they can justify shooting someone