

The Democrats’ Secret Plan to Destroy Democracy
How will they destroy something that has never existed?
Atheism is the opiate of the insufferable.
That is all.
The Democrats’ Secret Plan to Destroy Democracy
How will they destroy something that has never existed?
The attempted assassination of Frick by Berkman was probably one of the biggest self-owns an anarchist has ever managed, and should serve as a cautionary tale to every radical about the dangers not just of unilateral action but also of the kind of unilateral thinking that can lead a radical into convincing themselves that they know “better” than the working class they are (supposedly) acting in solidarity with.
When “propaganda of the deed” works, it really works - but when it doesn’t it has a tendency to blow up in everyone’s faces.
Yeah, this is the way - see the working class like idiotic children while patting ourselves on the back for our amazing and utterly irrelevant circlejerking super-powers.
What could possibly go wrong?
And I’m supposed to shed tears for America’s political police goons because… ?
Yeah that’s sort if why it’s evil.
Wether it’s evil or not is irrelevant - if that’s the conversation you want, we have to start off with all the stuff that isn’t evil about the US (because it’s such a short list, you see)
Now tou understand why the fascists ard going to die even if we stand back and do nothing.
Oh, yeah… they’ll die, all right - from old age and in the most luxurious surroundings, too. Just like Kissinger did.
Maintaining chaos is the goal.
That’s not a sustainable strategy - at one point or the other, the chaos becomes organised against you. Just look at the utterly unassailable position the Taliban is now in thanks to the US’s complete defeat in Afghanistan - which, remember, the US could once easily invade using airbases inside Russia. That is now a thing of the past - the US is essentially now locked out of much of central Asia.
Invading Iran is going to be a far, far worse disaster for the US than Afghanistan and Iraq put together - and there is only so much defeat that the US can handle.
Lottery. Love doesn’t pay the rent.
Yes.
Another day, another war the US has zero chance of winning.
Fuck Europig.
I actually agree with you - I believe that you only pick up a gun when you have a pretty good idea what (or who) you’ll be shooting at very soon.
But then again I did grow up in a fascist state - so that might have something to do with it.
Yeah maybe accepting libs as allies is a mistake.
Who coulda thunk it?
Sorry to burst your bubble - but the Biden regime ran psyops here in South Africa to interfere with our politics. That’s why the South African government threw it’s weight behind the whole ICJ thing.
That has suddenly ended with Trump because Trump is incompetent at the imperialism game - and that’s preferable as far as I’m concerned.
Fascism is just colonialism coming home to roost - and under Trump you don’t get to ignore that. That, as far as I’m concerned, is preferable, too.
Oh… 20 million dead people is just a cheap prop to you, is that it?
What are you? A tankie?
is a sign that “I don’t understand”
Yeah. 20 milion dead is not a gotcha, Clyde.
Perhaps stop glorifying things you don’t understand. The Soviet people doing most of the fighting and dying is what the West wanted all along.
I don’t think we’ll be getting any backup this time, it’s up to us.
If you don’t, you’re screwed - bullets don’t grow on trees… not even in the US.
while we wait for backup from the French and English
You’re going to be waiting a long, long time.
The Soviet people also did most of the dying.
Egads!
You mean you want to have a resource that explains these things to you in a way that would actually matter to the working class? The nerve! Have you considered what that would that do to our leftist-circlejerking credibility? Have you considered what would that mean for our precious hierarchy of leftist purity?
No, you didn’t - you only think about yourself!
Sorry, I just couldn’t resist - I’m done laying it on so thick now.
It really depends on what you mean by “simpler.” I’ve been seeing a lot of (supposedly) smart people take Einstein to task for his whole “if you can’t explain it to a six-year-old you don’t understand it yourself” thing - and that just makes me suspect that they don’t understand anything as well as they assume themselves to do.
Have you tried The Anarchist FAQ?. It’s good - but it’s nowhere near what I would call “simple.”