The heart wants a fucking sidewalk.

That’s just band of brothers… Great show btw.

I saw some videos of dogs using those buttons that will say human words when pressed. Obviously the popular videos are from abnormally intelligent dogs but my takeaway was that animals are incredibly perceptive and aware. They understand a lot of what you’re trying to communicate, unless it’s some abstract human nonsense.

You’re gonna need more than 1 million.

Advertising works, and changes your habits and opinions, whether you acknowledge this or not.

I think I can make out Sadaam Hussein in the bottom right diagram.

In my opinion, both services seem usable for free, anonymous, web based email, but the proton mail CEO made some alarming political comments in support of conservatives and Donald trump. I would prefer that a company stay apolitical when a major appeal of their product is supposedly privacy.

Shörider’s dilemma

This is called dysphagia when it becomes a problem.

That man’s name, Christopher Columbus

The label usually says total surface area in the package. The stores near me break the price down to cost per unit of area, as well. This really untangles the 'how much should I pay for a quadrahedroll vs a dodecca butt sphere" worth of paper?

Would you mark this as nsfw, please? Her ports are all showing!

There’s certainly a lot to discuss, relative to experimental design and ethics. Peer review and good design hopefully minimize the clearly undesirable scenarios you describe as well as other subtle sources of error.

I was really just trying to explain what we’re looking at on op’s graph.

My limited knowledge on this subject: The z-score is how many standard deviations you are from the mean.

In statistical analysis, things are often evaluated against a p (probability) of 0.05 (or 5%), which also corresponds to a z-score of 1.96 (or roughly 2).

So, when you’re looking at your data, things with a z score >2 or <2 would correspond to findings that are “statistically significant,” in that you’re at least 95% sure that your findings aren’t due to random chance.

As others here have pointed out, z-scores closer to 0 would correspond to findings where they couldn’t be confident that whatever was being tested was any different than the control, akin to a boring paper which wouldn’t be published. “We tried some stuff but idk, didn’t seem to make a difference.” But it could also make for an interesting paper, “We tried putting healing crystals above cancer patients but it didn’t seem to make any difference.”

I remember hearing years ago how the M1 Abrams was a battlefield domination machine that could only be killed by another M1. That was clearly propaganda. Those overweight, overpriced pieces of shit got lit the fuck up after being shipped to Ukraine.

I like mint a lot. I found the transition from windows to be pretty straightforward. I’ve been giving Debian a shot on a separate computer, with a few different desktop environments. For me, mint with cinnamon has really been the more trouble-free, more familiar experience.

Here’s hoping a democratic socialist turns out to be more progressive than your standard “not actually liberal” democrat.

This is how I imagine every dickhead on the freeway, dangerously changing lanes in traffic, gaining entire seconds of progress with each aggressive move. For what, another 30 seconds on the couch?

Reminds me of the Linux stats. Desktop adoption is really taking off!: 2.6% -> 2.7%

So brave