The article title, and this post title, and everything inside of it is disingenuous, and rage bait inducing.
Trying to put words in the mouth of a person, having them deny it, and then putting the words in their mouth anyway in the title is not journalism. It’s just a tabloid
The BBC is quite rightly trying to report factual information without making determinations in the reporting. Not to mention the practical issue, if you label a belligerent, you’re less likely to get media access to that belligerent. Which is one of the missions of a reporting organization.
The title is more than disingenuous. It’s an outright lie. He said: “What do I think about Hamas? Terrorists. It’s a terrorist act. It’s quite straightforward.”
The article title, and this post title, and everything inside of it is disingenuous, and rage bait inducing.
Trying to put words in the mouth of a person, having them deny it, and then putting the words in their mouth anyway in the title is not journalism. It’s just a tabloid
The BBC is quite rightly trying to report factual information without making determinations in the reporting. Not to mention the practical issue, if you label a belligerent, you’re less likely to get media access to that belligerent. Which is one of the missions of a reporting organization.
The title is more than disingenuous. It’s an outright lie. He said: “What do I think about Hamas? Terrorists. It’s a terrorist act. It’s quite straightforward.”
This article isn’t news, it’s blatant rage bait. Even lemmy.ml moderates better than that.