Everything in nutrition involves outrage

I’ve never used perks to decide if I’m going to take or leave a job, it’s strictly compensation that matters.

Factor in paid time off to increase compensation per unit time calculation

1000% this. Never sleep on your 83b

Independent third party to ensure boundaries are set and clearly communicated between the actors, and to observe the act to ensure process is followed and to stop things if they are not.

It is self hosted

It is not on-prem

It’s not safe for work. Would a teacher in a classroom be ok with this on their feed? How about a secretary at a lawyers office? How about being on a crowded train?

My strong recommendation is you add the nsfw tag, or post this over on lemmynsfw.com

This really should be nsfw

Currently there aren’t enough tools for small communities. It’s hard for a niche community to grow and flourish.

If you post something like ‘BBQ is delicious’, it becomes a open referendum for the entirety of Lemmy to tell you why everything you said is wrong. Everybody dog piles their own personal biases and issues. And that’s fine for a general discussion.

lemmy needs smaller community safe spaces so the conversations can grow by interested parties, that’s currently lacking. Like a subscriber only post, only seen by people who subscribe to a community. And then when it gets large enough, people can say I want this to be generally available. I think that would help a lot

its been about 36 hours since the last usgs recorded earthquake, maybe its over?

and i made a promise to you i would always be welcoming and would be sure to let you know your invited to enumerate your reasoning on the paradox of tolerance whenever you are ready.

when your feeling generous enough to lay out your reasoning, i welcome your future explination

Science Literature

• Long-Term Intake of Red Meat in Relation to Dementia Risk and Cognitive Function in US Adults
• Meat supplementation improves growth, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes in Kenyan children - 2007
• Total Meat Intake is Associated with Life Expectancy: A Cross-Sectional Data Analysis of 175 Contemporary Populations - 2022
• Behavioral Characteristics and Self-Reported Health Status among 2029 Adults Consuming a “Carnivore Diet” - 2021
• Egg Consumption and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study of Australian Community-Dwelling Older Adults - 2025
• Can a carnivore diet provide all essential nutrients? - 2020

Foundational Literature

• The effect of prolonged use of exclusive meat diets on two men - 1930
• Studies of Nutrition: The Physique and Health of Two African Tribes. - 1931

Fringe Resources

Angry Guys, With Correct Science, But really hostile

• Professor Bart Kay
• Edward Goeke

Historical Books

The relation of alimentation and disease - Salisbury 1888

The fat of the land - Stefansson - 1946

Ok, I never really got a answer to this question so its been sitting in the back my of my head for a long time. I’ve stumbled across a plausible explanation

The Randall cycle : A cross inhibition between glucose and fatty acid metabolism in every cell. When both high glucose levels and high fatty acid levels exist at the same time the Randle cycle causes the cell to rapidly fluctuate between both method, which does cause stress and inflammation in the cell… now some handwaving… this is manifested as insulin resistance (i.e. the cell can’t update more glucose because of the Randle cycle inhibition)

Now… this is a CROSS inhibition… so if you remove one of the sources (glucose, and fatty acids) then the Randle cycle just stays in one mode and you don’t get the seesaw inflammation.

This would account for the all starch diet being able to fix insulin resistance (no free fatty acids). It’s a mechanistic explanation that works for me. i don’t understand it fully, but it seems to fit.

Obviously going all glucose isn’t super healthy, and I wouldn’t recommend it, but it has been a puzzle on why it works in some circumstances.

i.e. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlsjnLMANDQ

100%. The core problem is inserted politics won’t save a bad project, and since the project is bad the only interesting thing to talk about is the inserted politics.

A great project, or even just good, can insert whatever it likes and people will focus on the good parts and the inserted politics won’t dominate the conversation.

My rule of thumb: if the only thing you hear about a project is how political it is, then it’s a bad project and there is nothing else worth talking about.

Yeah, it’s good for high frequency communication because its more resilient to noise and capacitive interference.

Here is my current understanding

For some external reason you are prejudiced against zero carb. In the heat of the moment you thought you would punch down on a tiny community by saying it’s dangerous that it exists, invoking the paradox of tolerance, implying it’s a Nazi type of thing.

When asked why a diet is something causes intolerance by tolerating it you realized you didn’t have a good reason for that statement. You have attempted to leave gaps for others to infer your reasons because stating them explicitly would show how inconsistent they were.

This entire comment thread has been a demonstration of avoidance.

If I’m wrong, please disabuse me of my conclusion.

LVDS is just a standard for pairwise low voltage differential signaling. You still need a protocol on top of that to talk to the video controller.

Shouldn’t Greenland be much smaller?