There are a lot of GOP-controller legislatures in the USA pushing through so-called “child protection” laws, but there’s a toll in the form of impacting people’s rights and data privacy. Most of these bills involve requiring adults to upload a copy of their photo ID.

  • jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please explain it to me like I’m five. How can the authentication service not know what your authenticating against? How can it provide you a token that you can’t use over and over again, or past other people?

    OAuth specifically wants to know what you’re using your tokens for.

    In principle if you insert a middleman into a transaction the middleman knows about the transaction. Thus it’s violates privacy

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What good is it for the system to know, if the system disregards that information right after auth? Effectively it’s like no one ever knew.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re confusing intents and capabilities. When we’re talking about security and privacy we have to talk about capabilities. Not intents.

        Somebody could have the best intentions, but you don’t want to give them the capability to hurt you. If it’s not necessary. So does a daycare need a volunteer militia to hang out all day cleaning their weapons? Probably not, the capability even if well intended is antithetical to the security and welfare of the children.

        Even if the intention is good today, putting the framework and capability in just invites future corruption.

          • jetA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If the system exists it will be abused. Therefore the government should not create the system to start with