• jetA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    And in our scenario the 16-year-old girl with the baby and Dead family, she has spent years attacking her neighbors? And she must suffer for it? This is the disconnect we’re not agreeing on.

    They cannot leave. It’s literally a closed prison.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      She isn’t suffering for it. She can’t leave because nobody wants her.

      Israel isn’t bombing a house to punish anyone. They are bombing a house to kill combatants trying to kill them.

      That is why it isn’t collective punishment. They are fighting a war and not punishing people.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Buy your own admission they’re denying food and water and medicine into Gaza. That is also definitional collective punishment.

        The whole daddy’s home system and the up to 20 collateral budget for strikes inside of Gaza also speaks to collective punishment

        You seem to be operating from the theory that as long as there’s any military justification, or rationale, it’s not collective punishment. Collective punishment is highly effective from a military perspective. There is no denying that. The reason we say collective punishment is terrible, is because your externalizing the pain onto people uninvolved.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Buy your own admission they’re denying food and water and medicine into Gaza. That is also definitional collective punishment. They are not denying it. They just are not providing it. The US, Jordan and others are dropping food and supplies. Israel has not tried to stop that.

          You seem to be operating from the theory that as long as there’s any military justification, or rationale, it’s not collective punishment.

          You keep trying to define collective punishment as something you don’t like and not by the laws of warfare.

          • jetA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I asked you to define the laws of warfare, and you link to the Wikipedia page about collective punishment. I quoted the definition from Wikipedia. This fits that definition. I’m operating by your own rules.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              That definition doesn’t fit the scenario.

              Let’s see you articulate exactly how this is collective punishment.