@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 26 days agoWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down14cross-posted to: pcmasterrace@zerobytes.monstertechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1475arrow-down1external-linkWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.com@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 26 days agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: pcmasterrace@zerobytes.monstertechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareToes♀linkfedilinkEnglish41•26 days agoAnything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
minus-squareZeppolinkfedilinkEnglish37•26 days agoIt doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
minus-square@jetAlinkEnglish13•26 days agoAnything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
minus-squareNullPointerlinkfedilinkEnglish15•26 days agoI’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
minus-square@jetAlinkEnglish14•26 days agoAs long as it’s your choice, sure. But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.
Anything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
It doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
Anything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
I’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
As long as it’s your choice, sure.
But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.