Hi,

A friend wants to degoogle his phone, so I suggested the OS I’m currently using. The one we can’t talk about… He wants a small/compact phone, so I suggested pixel 4a (not buying second hand though), but I’m afraid that planned obsolescence may kill the phone rather soon. What’s your opinion?

Cheers and thank you for your help,

  • jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Could you explain how phones are insecure by design?

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can use two factor, fingerprint plus pin and have the pin layout randomize each time.

            • jetA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think phones are the MOST secure devices most people have. They are locked down, they run software in very restricted containers, they have more restrictive feature allowance. for 99% of the people the phone is the most secure device, full stop.

              Can you do better on a computer? Sure, but it takes a bunch of work and isn’t the out of box experience

                • jetA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Please help me understand your point of view. So far all you have said in this conversation is that other people are wrong. That may be, but your not helping us understand you

                  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    The key to encryption is to have your key encrypted with a strong passphrase.

                    Phones are literally designed to be convenient. Convenient is the antithesis of security.

                    You want a 20-100+ character passphrase to symmetrically encrypt your private keys, and you want to never type that in public.

                    Most people have 4 digit pins on their phones, and they constantly type them in public, in plain view of others. And its super easy to snatch out of their hands and run.

                    Phones are, by design, not secure devices. Marketing teams trying to sell you something say otherwise. Don’t be gullible.

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              So you’re saying that, in order for me to steal everything on your phone, all I have to do is stand behind you in a supermarket and film you unlock your screen once. Then, on the way to your car, I quickly pull a knife on you and force you to tap your finger on your phone, then I hop on a motorbike and ride away.

              Hope you didn’t have any banking apps or crypto on your phone, because now that’s gone.

              QubesOS on a laptop is much much safer.

              • zephyr@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                If you have GrapheneOS, I’m pretty sure you can randomize the numbers on the pin. You can also set a password instead of a pin and disable biometrics if you use stock Android. All the more difficult to obtain access.

                For banking/crypto, I assume a wallet app would allow you to set an app password/pin.

                  • zephyr@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I suppose you are correct there. Maybe try a privacy screen protector or use a password. It would be harder to catch each symbol with either of those.

              • jetA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Qubes is immune to the knife to the throat threat model?

                • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  They would need to kidnap you to type multiple different passwords. The point is that they can’t quickly unlock the device. Mobile phones are literally designed to be easy to unlock.