• jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fair enough the theory of different economic engines allows both to be centralized or decentralized.

    As realized the economic engines that were labeled as communist were very centralized.

    How would a decentralized communist society look like? How would different communes compete for scare resources? How would disputes be resolved?

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How would different communes compete for scare resources? How would disputes be resolved?

      The only straight answers I’ve ever received on the matter mostly ammount to wishful thinking.

      A small community can definitely be communist, and it is possible to achieve inter-communal dependance with mutual trade relationships, but without a medium of exchange I suspect that it’d be far more difficult and other factors make the situation strike me as incredibly unstable, because the incentives to defect could easily outweigh those of cooperation.

      The real answer is that I don’t know, and we don’t have enough data to say what would work.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt:_The_First_5,000_Years

        I really like this book, and I think it’s relevant to this discussion. It talks about how the original currency in history was not money, but reputation and relationships.

        Once you scale out to the point where personal relationships are unsustainable, societies and history transition to something more material. Be it transactional barter, or what we think of is money today.