Since science is deductive it’s probably impossible to prove the negative there, but I think there’s enough evidence beyond reasonable doubt that you can confidently deny it (unless your god is non-falsifiable, in which case it’s not worth discussion).
Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. The default position is not to believe in anything unless evidence is demonstrated.
It’s the duty of the theists to provide evidence, not the atheists.
Do I believe in god? No.
Do I deny the existence of god? No.
I don’t have evidence either way
Since science is deductive it’s probably impossible to prove the negative there, but I think there’s enough evidence beyond reasonable doubt that you can confidently deny it (unless your god is non-falsifiable, in which case it’s not worth discussion).
Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. The default position is not to believe in anything unless evidence is demonstrated. It’s the duty of the theists to provide evidence, not the atheists.
Same logic applies to unicorn and dragons, to be honest
they might exist, somewhere