Ive been running a home lab for awhile and its gotten pretty sophisticated over the years. About to destroy and rebuild. As such I want to document things and plan it all out nicely (I’ve been inspired by posts here!)

My problem is most likely my usage of a Mac these days. Visio doesnt work on the mac in a thick client, and the web client is pretty cool, but it’s quite confining in terms of shapes. Curious what you guys are using with the logo’ed graphics for every vendor/brand etc. Ideally something free, but not opposed to paying for a quality service/software.

Thanks in advance!

  • DaGhostDS@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use the Draw.Io desktop app, not the web version for obvious reason.

    Use to do it on Visio… But well Microsoft destroyed it.

  • mauros_lykos@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    draw.io. Not sure if there is a mac version (I’m running it on linux) but in any case there is a web version in which you can save (an load) your files locally.

  • wdoler@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use plantUML. Its alright, gets you the first 95% of the way there very quickly but the last 5% of formatting is just impossible

  • cylemmulo@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Technically you can get a web browser version of vision but I’ve used lucidchart and draw.io before and they’re good. Lucid has good Visio compatibility, draw not so much

  • Bob_Spud@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    For design documentation where detail is required - MS Word with some colour where required. Never saw the point in using visio or any other graphic packages.

    A technical audience doesn’t need a graphical representation of an object looks like. If they don’t know what the object looks like they have problems. Virtual objects being represented by physical counterparts can be confusing and pointless.

    Graphics are only useful for presentations and sales - it may save time in explaining what the objects are.

    • modernDayKing@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      As a visual, technical person I see your point but disagree.

      I don’t need (but like) the logos. I can understand the layout in hierarchical text.

      But it absolutely helps me / is easier, to see the lines showing the interfaces connections.

    • reklis@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, this. I’m a big fan of the “diagrams as code” things like d2, mermaid, plantuml, nomnoml and all that. Obsidian has render plugins too so you can easily visualize things.