I recently found out that Signal supports stickers created by users and was very happy about it. For me, the easiest way to install was this site. Thank you, Signal developers!

  • jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad they’re doing work. I would love for them to do more substantial work then teenage meme stuff.

    Decentralization

    Pseudonyms, nicknames. So you can talk to people without giving them your phone number.

    Registration without a phone number, perhaps in lieu of a donation

    • FarLine99@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think nicknames may appear in beta in the not too distant future, as there is already a flag to enable this functionality. A phone number will still be required (you can use a VOIP number if you are not satisfied with this requirement). Decentralization? LOL. It’s not about Signal by any means. The features are already being implemented slowly enough, and with decentralization we’ll never see them at all. You’ll have to go to Matrix or SimpleX for that.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Signal is already illegal in several countries. It’s only a matter of time before it becomes illegal in its host country. Decentralization is the only way forward for a sustainable communication method

        • FarLine99@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree. So I personally really like the way SimpleX is evolving. If the developer develops it further in the same direction, then in a year or two we will have a very good alternative to Signal. But decentralized, without a phone number, without the USA.

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.mlB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never looked into why the removed it. Is SMS a securi risk? Maybe they’ll bring it back with RCS.

      • bug@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because SMS has zero security and including it in a secure messenger gave some people a false sense of security. Basically Signal is for secure messaging, SMS is insecure, therefore it has no place there.

        • jetA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it was more code to be responsible for test and update

  • gelberhut@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And I found that signal likes to delink my windows app and does not allow me to sync history of conversations after I relink it again. This makes signal mostly unusable for me.

    But, yes - stickers and stories are nice. Not that sure, however, that people who need them will find signal good enough in general, while people who like signal in general do need stickers and stories.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know. But this feature must be configurable. Especially since signal loses pairing time to time. This and few other intended features make it hardly usable, some people can accept such discomfort as a price of security, others - don’t.

        • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I completely understand how annoying that is if you care about it. I’m not gonna lie, every now and then I hate it, too.

          People want convenience and comfort, and who can blame them. It’s such a big problem nowadays that privacy and data security is not the convenient, default option.

          We have to go out of our way to take our privacy back, and most people just won’t bother. And again, completely understandable.

          • gelberhut@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            In case of history sync, I do not understand why it cannot be synced with approval from the main device, to be honest.

            • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe it has something to with the encryption, with how forward secrecy works or something like that. But then again, I don’t know enough about how any of this works.