Kern County wants to use billions in federal tax credits to collect and bury carbon. To do so, it would build new facilities to produce more of the most abundant greenhouse gas.
Oh shit really? Plants? This is the first time I’ve heard of such a thing. Anyway, that’s one way to remove some carbon, but it probably won’t be enough on its own.
These are carbon negative ways of capturing carbon that don’t require any resources to be mined or shipped or warehoused or any of the other logistical carbon emissions that you’re not taking into account with carbon capture.
Oh shit really? Plants? This is the first time I’ve heard of such a thing. Anyway, that’s one way to remove some carbon, but it probably won’t be enough on its own.
May I also interest you in algae?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925857416305778
These are carbon negative ways of capturing carbon that don’t require any resources to be mined or shipped or warehoused or any of the other logistical carbon emissions that you’re not taking into account with carbon capture.
https://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/David_and_Herzog.pdf
We need to be focusing on methane capture and sequester if we’re talking about future gains to reverse global warming.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/methane-capture-air-global-warming-climate
Also you might want to investigate who’s funding these carbon capture studies
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dont-fall-for-big-oils-carbon-capture-deceptions/
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/02/08/climate-expert-debunks-big-oils-lies-about-carbon-capture-nature-based-solutions
https://apnews.com/article/carbon-capture-removal-cop28-fossil-fuels-oil-gas-2bc53c6a8df6d337c1afcabad56377e8
I mean keep up that snarky flippant energy though, it’s doing wonders for your argument. Remember you’re the only smart person in the room.
this is the post I was hoping to see!. Bravo!