• Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a lot of tritium, versus baseline. Continental precipitation tritium is ~10 TU, the maximum ocean surface readings at high runoff locations (elevation runoff, not industrial) are ~2TU, most ocean readings are ~0.25 TU.

    1 TU = 0.15 Bql

    So this is >125x what is found in uncontimanated freshwater, or >625x what is found in the worst measured ocean runoff locations, or ~5,000x average ocean readings, and >8,000x Southern Ocean surface waters.

    This is also after all the atomic bomb tests, that added most of the tritium in the environment today. here is a cool paper about using tritium to measure ocean currents that I got most of my data from.

    It may be safe for humans, but I don’t think you can handwave away potential dangers to aquatic life based off that.

    Additional info taken from references to this book.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, the main opponent here is China, who allegedly puts way more tritium into the water than Japan. So it’s a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

      South Korea doesn’t seem to have an issue with it, and S. Korea is also an economic rival of Japan. But maybe S. Korea is less affected because of currents, IDK.

      So we should definitely study the effects, and I’m sure there are plenty of interested parties doing just that, but we shouldn’t be going on the attack until there’s actual data pointing out harm. Right now there’s mostly FUD, and until that becomes fact (i.e. an adjustment to WHO or a similar body’s standards), I think we should monitor it closely but go forward with it.