hello everyone - you may know me as @[email protected]. just recently, i got banned from hexbear for “history of repeating US state department talking points, anti-socialism and zionism”, as well as possible “fedposting”.

let me clarify that although i strongly support socialism and the ideas of liberating people from their corporate overlords, i am still learning about this. if anything that i’ve said on hexbear are considered “us state department talking points”, as well as “antisocialism”, “zionism” and even “fedposting” by the hexbear mods in any way, i sincerely apologize.

i personally disagree with stalinism, i mostly prefer the more libertarian forms of communism (like council communism, for example), but i’m open to hearing any and all perspectives from all parts of the socialist spectrum, whether it be marxism, leninism, stalinism/marxism-leninism, trotskyism, de leonism, social democracy, democratic socialism, georgism, libertarian socialism, market socialism, syndicalism, anarcho-communism, and even maoism and the likes.

i myself support a fusion of left-libertarianism, market socialism, georgism and de leonism. i’m also NOT a federal agent, i do NOT intend on entrapping people, and i oppose the actions of ice agents, as they are using force.

to any hexbear admin or mod, i apologize for any comment that i’ve made that can be seen as “repeating US state department talking points, antisocialism and zionism”

i really hope this clears that up.

  • Dirt_Possum [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago
    1. then why are you arguing with me? You’re not arguing with the article because it’s clear you didn’t read it.
    2. wut. If you’re asking me to link it again, ok, here but it’s the same link you can click on if you scroll up 4 comments above this one.
    • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      okay, let me go over the article:

      1. there are people in government other than the kim dynasty - however, i do think the dprk are focusing a bit more on the kims, and should probably focus on the other people in government.
      2. the dprk’s ideology is probably culturally conservative

      that said, who’s really in control of north korea; the supreme leader, or the chair of the standing committee of the supreme people’s assembly?