• Deborah@hachyderm.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    100%. In the US, it’s also a Catch-22 legal issue. It’s an ADA violation to have a workplace that’s full of constant alcohol & required boozy work events if anyone around is an alcoholic, but the only way you can invoke the legal issue here is by having somebody tell their workplace that they have an alcoholism problem, which is incredibly risky. Like astronomically beyond risky.

    tl;dr, anyone who prevents paulg from making an unsafe workplace for women is probably just some kind of misandrist.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s a great point. I hadn’t even considered the alcoholics who are in recovery or attempting to abstain.

      Like, I don’t think anyone but active alcoholics or people with serious work life balance issues would want booze on tap at work. As someone who works to have a healthy relationship with alcohol I generally don’t drink at all on work nights (maybe a low or medium abv beer or a glass of wine, but I’m not opening a bottle of wine on a work night for sure).

      Like yeah, college sure was fun getting drunk on a Tuesday night, but I couldn’t afford to get that drunk, I was drinking with friends, and I was 21 and didn’t get hangovers unless I was dangerously drunk. I’m a grown ass woman with a wife and career now and my body doesn’t handle booze the way it used to. If my job gave me booze I’d want something like a bottle or 6-pack of something decent to enjoy with my wife on a Friday evening, but even then I wouldn’t want alcoholics to feel tempted or left out. In general the less time I spend with coworkers instead of my wife the happier I am.

      But these concerns must just mean I hate men and fun